March 2012
Volume 53, Issue 14
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   March 2012
Ultra high-speed swept source Fourier domain mode locking (FDML) OCT at 1.68, 3.3 and 6.7 MHz - Image quality of retinal cross sectional scans
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Lukas Reznicek
    Department of Ophthalmology,
    Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany
  • Thomas Klein
    Institute for Biomolecular Optics, Faculty of Physics,
    Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany
  • Wolfgang Wieser
    Institute for Biomolecular Optics, Faculty of Physics,
    Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany
  • Aljoscha Neubauer
    Department of Ophthalmology,
    Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany
  • Christoph Eigenwillig
    Institute for Biomolecular Optics, Faculty of Physics,
    Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany
  • Benjamin Biedermann
    Institute for Biomolecular Optics, Faculty of Physics,
    Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany
  • Anselm Kampik
    Department of Ophthalmology,
    Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany
  • Robert Huber
    Institute for Biomolecular Optics, Faculty of Physics,
    Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  Lukas Reznicek, None; Thomas Klein, None; Wolfgang Wieser, None; Aljoscha Neubauer, None; Christoph Eigenwillig, None; Benjamin Biedermann, None; Anselm Kampik, None; Robert Huber, None
  • Footnotes
    Support  None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science March 2012, Vol.53, 5259. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Lukas Reznicek, Thomas Klein, Wolfgang Wieser, Aljoscha Neubauer, Christoph Eigenwillig, Benjamin Biedermann, Anselm Kampik, Robert Huber; Ultra high-speed swept source Fourier domain mode locking (FDML) OCT at 1.68, 3.3 and 6.7 MHz - Image quality of retinal cross sectional scans. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2012;53(14):5259.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract
 
Purpose:
 

To evaluate the image quality of cross sectional scans obtained with swept source Fourier domain mode locking (FDML) OCT at 1.68 MHz, 3.3 MHz and 6.7 MHz.

 
Methods:
 

A 1050nm swept source FDML OCT system was constructed running at 1.68 MHz, 3.3 MHz. Effective imaging speed was additionally doubled to 6.7 MHz two spots in parallel. Scanning time for a wide-field coverage consisting of two million axial scans was 1.32 sec (1.68 MHz), 0.66 sec (3.3 MHz) and 0.33 sec (6.7 MHz), respectively. Total incident power was 1.6 mW in accordance with Laser Safety Standards (ANSI, USA). Even in the case of two-spot imaging, the combined total power did not exceed 1.6mW. For each scanning speed, averaged OCT cross sectional scans of a healthy subject were compared for image quality.

 
Results:
 

Measured sensitivity at 1.68 MHz, was 91.5 dB, corresponding to shot noise limited detection for the employed interferometer configuration. Shot noise limited detection at 3.3 MHz and 6.7 MHz was 88.5 dB and 85.5 dB respectively. Evaluation and comparison of averaged FDML OCT images showed reasonable contrast and resolution of individual retinal layers at 1.68 MHz and 3.3 MHz with inferior image quality at 6.7 MHz.

 
Conclusions:
 

Ultra high-speed FDML OCT is feasible at 1.68 MHz, 3.3 MHz, and, for the first time at 6.7 MHz, see Figure 1. Reasonable image quality can be achieved with 1.68 MHz, followed by 3.3 MHz. Based on our observations we suggest a sensitivity threshold of a minimum of 90 dB for retinal imaging, which currently limits imaging speed to around 1.68 MHz axial scan rate.However, we would like to point out that for MHz and especially multi-MHz imaging, the fast scanning speed and short illumination duration of down to 0.3 sec may allow for higher incident power levels in accordance with safety standards, especially in the case of multi-spot imaging.  

 
Keywords: imaging methods (CT, FA, ICG, MRI, OCT, RTA, SLO, ultrasound) • image processing • imaging/image analysis: clinical 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×