March 2012
Volume 53, Issue 14
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   March 2012
Full Field Electroretinogram Using A Fiber Electrode Prototype In Patients With Retinal Dystrophy
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Josenilson M. Pereira
    Ophthalmology, Univ Federal de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil
  • Daniel M. Rocha
    Ophthalmology, Univ Federal de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil
  • Paula Y. Sacai
    Ophthalmology, Univ Federal de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil
  • Sung E. Watanabe
    Ophthalmology, Univ Federal de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil
  • Solange R. Salomao
    Ophthalmology, Univ Federal de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil
  • Adriana Berezovsky
    Ophthalmology, Univ Federal de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  J.M. Pereira: None. D.M. Rocha: None. P.Y. Sacai: None. S.E. Watanabe: None. S.R. Salomao: None. A. Berezovsky: None.
  • Footnotes
    Support  FAPESP # 04;02669-6; 05;56459-5; CNPq # 474251;2009-8; CNPq Research Scholarship to AB and SRS
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science March 2012, Vol.53, 5689. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Josenilson M. Pereira, Daniel M. Rocha, Paula Y. Sacai, Sung E. Watanabe, Solange R. Salomao, Adriana Berezovsky; Full Field Electroretinogram Using A Fiber Electrode Prototype In Patients With Retinal Dystrophy. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2012;53(14):5689.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract
 
Purpose:
 

To compare electroretinogram (ERG) responses to full-field stimuli recorded with microfiber electrode prototype, DTL® and contact lens electrodes (Burian-Allen) in patients with retinal dystrophy.

 
Methods:
 

Right eye of 50 patients with previously diagnosed retinal dystrophy had full-field ERG recorded (ISCEV standard full-field protocol) using three distinct types of electrodes in three consecutive visits in the same week. Subjects were aged 10-76 years (36.0±16.9 years, 26 females). VERIS 5.1.9 system was used for data acquisition and analysis. ERG outcomes were analyzed by Kruskal-Wallis test and multiple comparison procedures by Dunnett’s method. Retinal dystrophy type was classified on the basis of standard clinical criteria as: retinitis pigmentosa, cone dystrophy, Stargardt’s disease and others. ERG responses were compared with normative data from our own lab.

 
Results:
 

The specific type of ERG abnormality was consistent with clinical findings in all tested patients. Median values amplitudes and b-wave implicit time for both scotoptic and photopic responses using the three types of electrodes are shown in the following table. Waveform morphology of rod and cone electrodes responses were similar to those obtained with the three types of electrodes. There was a trend for larger amplitudes using Burian-Allen when compared to either the microfiber electrode prototype or DTL® for rod, maximal, cone and 30Hz flicker responses. No statistical differences were found for amplitude and implicit time among microfiber electrode prototype, DTL® and Burian-Allen for all ISCEV responses.

 
Conclusions:
 

ERGs were successfully recorded using these three types of electrodes in patients with retinal dystrophies. microfiber electrode prototype electrodes were validated as a diagnostic tool since its results were comparable to the other two types of electrodes. Therefore, this new instrument is an alternative method to assess retinal function and might be a feasible choice for ERG recordings especially in patients with abnormalities in the ocular surface and uncooperative/sensitive patients.  

 
Keywords: electroretinography: clinical • electrophysiology: clinical • retina 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×