March 2012
Volume 53, Issue 14
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   March 2012
Time Course Of Induced Astigmatism After Canaloplasty
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Anselm G. Junemann
    Ophthalmology, University of Erlangen Nurnberg, Erlangen, Germany
  • Juliane Schlomberg
    Ophthalmology, University of Erlangen Nurnberg, Erlangen, Germany
  • Folkert K. Horn
    Ophthalmology, University of Erlangen Nurnberg, Erlangen, Germany
  • Robert Rejdak
    General Ophthalmology, Medical University of Lublin, Lublin, Poland
  • Friedrich E. Kruse
    Ophthalmology, University of Erlangen Nurnberg, Erlangen, Germany
  • Michaela C. Moelle
    Ophthalmology, University of Erlangen Nurnberg, Erlangen, Germany
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  Anselm G. Junemann, None; Juliane Schlomberg, None; Folkert K. Horn, None; Robert Rejdak, None; Friedrich E. Kruse, None; Michaela C. Moelle, None
  • Footnotes
    Support  None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science March 2012, Vol.53, 5936. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Anselm G. Junemann, Juliane Schlomberg, Folkert K. Horn, Robert Rejdak, Friedrich E. Kruse, Michaela C. Moelle; Time Course Of Induced Astigmatism After Canaloplasty. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2012;53(14):5936.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose: : To study the changes in astigmatism after canaloplasty and to analyze its correlation with intraocular pressure (IOP) results.

Methods: : 26 selected eyes of 26 consecutive patients with primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG, n = 14) and pseudoexfoliative glaucoma (PEXG, n = 12) were included in this retrospective study. Canaloplasty comprised 360° catheterisation of Schlemm’s canal (SC) by means of a flexible microcatheter with distension of the canal by two tensioning 10-0 polypropylene sutures. Primary outcome measures included IOP, glaucoma medication usage, astigmatism and adverse events at 2 weeks, 4 weeks, 12 weeks and 24 weeks postoperatively. The study has received Institutional Review Board approval in form of Chairman procedure for the retrospective analysis of the data (No. 4564-CH).

Results: : The mean preoperative IOP was 21,1 ± 5,8 mmHg. The mean IOP decreased to 14,25 mmHg ± 4,3 mmHg at 6 months. Best corrected visual acuity did not change significantly. Mean astigmatism preoperatively was 0,77 diopters (D) ± 0,5 D which increased to 3,3 D ± 1,7 D at 2 weeks postoperatively (p ≤ 0,05; Wilcoxon-Test). Thereafter, the astigmatism underwent a spontaneous decline, reaching 1,9 D ± 0,8 D at 4 weeks and 1,2 D ± 0,74 D at 12 weeks postoperatively. Six months after canaloplasty mean astigmatism reached the preoperative range of 0,86 D ± 0,52 D. Mean astigmatism at 2 weeks correlated significantly with IOP at 6 months (r = 0,59, p = 0,005; Spearman). A logistic regression analysis including glaucoma diagnosis, age, preoperative IOP, hyphema, and bleb formation delivered significant result for mean astigmatism at 2 weeks.

Conclusions: : The change of astigmatism after canaloplasty follows a clear time course with a maximum at two weeks reaching preoperative values at six months. Our results indicate that the amount of surgically induced astigmatism might be helpful to predict outcome of canaloplasty in terms of IOP reduction.

Keywords: intraocular pressure • astigmatism • clinical (human) or epidemiologic studies: outcomes/complications 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×