March 2012
Volume 53, Issue 14
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   March 2012
Outcomes Of Combined Glaucoma And Cataract Surgery: Comparison Of Non-penetrating Deep Sclerectomy Vs Trabeculectomy
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Johannes Keller
    Ophthalmology, Hospital Clinic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
  • Alejandro Saint-Jean
    Ophthalmology, Hospital Clinic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
  • Marc Figueras Roca
    Ophthalmology, Hospital Clinic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
  • Concepción Larena Gómez
    Ophthalmology, Hospital Clinic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
  • Elena Millà Griñó
    Ophthalmology, Hospital Clinic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  Johannes Keller, None; Alejandro Saint-Jean, None; Marc Figueras Roca, None; Concepción Larena Gómez, None; Elena Millà Griñó, None
  • Footnotes
    Support  None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science March 2012, Vol.53, 5954. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Johannes Keller, Alejandro Saint-Jean, Marc Figueras Roca, Concepción Larena Gómez, Elena Millà Griñó; Outcomes Of Combined Glaucoma And Cataract Surgery: Comparison Of Non-penetrating Deep Sclerectomy Vs Trabeculectomy. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2012;53(14):5954.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract
 
Purpose:
 

To analyse the outcomes of two types of combined filtrating glaucoma surgery combined with cataract extraction in terms of visual acuity (VA) change, intraocular pressure (IOP) control, complication rate and need for further interventions.

 
Methods:
 

Retrospective case-note review of consecutive eyes operated with either non-penetrating deep sclerectomy (NPDS) or trabeculectomy (TBC) combined with phacoemulsification and intraocular lens implantation (PIOL) by two experienced surgeons at a single tertiary centre from 1 January 2008 until 31 December 2009. Complication rates, VA and postoperative management analysis was carried out in all cases. IOP control analysis included only uncomplicated cases with at least 360 days of follow-up.

 
Results:
 

DescriptionThere were 53 eyes, 42 of which (79.2%) received NPDS combined with PIOL. There were no significant demographic differences. 31 of the eyes had primary open angle glaucoma, 17 pseudoexfoliative glaucoma, 3 chronic angle-closure glaucoma and 1 neovascular glaucoma. There was a higher proportion (54.5% vs 28.6%) of pseudoexfoliative glaucomas in TBC cases. 1 case with NPDS had posterior capsule rupture. 2 cases of NPDS had minor problems with Descemet’s membrane dissection and 1 further case was converted to TBC due to membrane perforation. Median preoperative VA was 6/30 for TBC and 6/15 for NPDS. Mean preoperative IOP was 24.8 for NPDS and 23.4 for TBC. Median number of pressure-lowering drugs was 3 for NPDS and 2 for TBC.Visual acuityMedian postoperative VA was 6/7.5 for NPDS-PIOL and 6/10 for TBC-PIOLPressure controlMean IOP at 12 months were 15.4mmHg for NPDS and 14.9mmHg for TBC, no statistically significant difference (p = 0.42). 73.2% NPDS had no associated drugs after 12 months, whereas only 40% of patients with TBC were free from drops in this period (p = 0.044)Post-operative course24.4% of eyes with NPDS necessitated goniopuncture and 31.7% suturolysis compared with 20% of eyes that received TBC. 11.2% of eyes with NPDS developed postoperative hyphaema vs 18.2% of eyes with TBC. There were no instances of hypotony.

 
Conclusions:
 

Both operations seem to provide satisfactory pressure control however NPDS seems to be more effective on its own. NPDS requires more postoperative attention to maintain its function.

 
Keywords: clinical (human) or epidemiologic studies: outcomes/complications • intraocular pressure • small incision cataract surgery 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×