March 2012
Volume 53, Issue 14
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   March 2012
Field of View of Modified Osteo-Odonto Keratoprosthesis
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Victor M. Hernandez
    Ophthalmic Biophysics Center,
    Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, Miami, Florida
    Department of Biomedical Engineering, Biomedical Optics and Laser Laboratory, University of Miami, Coral Gables, Florida
  • Carolina de Freitas
    Ophthalmic Biophysics Center,
    Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, Miami, Florida
  • Giancarlo C. Falcinelli
    Department of Ophthalmology,
    Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, Miami, Florida
  • Yoh Sawatari
    Department of Maxillofacial Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida
  • Victor Perez
    Department of Ophthalmology,
    Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, Miami, Florida
  • Deepa Sathiah
    Department of Maxillofacial Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida
  • Fabrice Manns
    Ophthalmic Biophysics Center,
    Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, Miami, Florida
    Department of Biomedical Engineering, Biomedical Optics and Laser Laboratory, University of Miami, Coral Gables, Florida
  • Eduardo C. Alfonso
    Department of Ophthalmology,
    Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, Miami, Florida
  • Jean-Marie A. Parel
    Ophthalmic Biophysics Center,
    Department of Ophthalmology,
    Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, Miami, Florida
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  Victor M. Hernandez, None; Carolina de Freitas, None; Giancarlo C. Falcinelli, None; Yoh Sawatari, None; Victor Perez, None; Deepa Sathiah, None; Fabrice Manns, None; Eduardo C. Alfonso, None; Jean-Marie A. Parel, None
  • Footnotes
    Support  DOD Grant DAMD-W81XWH-09-1-0675, Florida Lions Eye Bank; NIH Center Grant P30EY14801; an unrestricted grant from Research to Prevent Blindness; Henri and Flore Lesieur Foundation (JMP).
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science March 2012, Vol.53, 6062. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Victor M. Hernandez, Carolina de Freitas, Giancarlo C. Falcinelli, Yoh Sawatari, Victor Perez, Deepa Sathiah, Fabrice Manns, Eduardo C. Alfonso, Jean-Marie A. Parel; Field of View of Modified Osteo-Odonto Keratoprosthesis. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2012;53(14):6062.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract
 
Purpose:
 

To calculate the field of view provided by Modified Osteo-Odonto Keratoprosthesis (MOOKP) as a function of the optical (curvature) and mechanical (cylinder length) design parameters.

 
Methods:
 

Calculations were done using paraxial geometrical optics equations for a plano-convex cylindrical MOOKP made of PMMA (n=1.491) with the convex surface exposed to air. The diameter of the optical cylinder was 3.8mm. The field of view (FOV) was defined as the smallest of the angle subtended by the anterior surface of the MOOKP with respect to the object nodal point and the angle subtended by the posterior surface of the MOOKP with respect to the image nodal point. The FOV was calculated for values of the preoperative axial eye length ranging from 15 to 30mm. For each value of the eye length, we calculated the anterior MOOKP radius of curvature required to produce an emmetropic eye. The FOV was then calculated for the resulting implant.

 
Results:
 

See graphs below. The graph on the left shows the relationship between the radius of curvature of the optic (in red), the axial length and the optical power of the MOOKP (in black). The graph on the right shows the relationship between the full FOV and the anterior radius of curvature. In subjects with normal eye length (23mm), the MOOKP radius is approximately 11mm, and a full FOV of approximately 30 degrees can be expected. The field of view decreases with increasing radius of curvature or increasing eye length.

 
Conclusions:
 

The field of view provided by MOOKP is strongly dependent on the power of the implant, which is determined by the eye length.  

 
Keywords: keratoprostheses • visual fields • optical properties 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×