March 2012
Volume 53, Issue 14
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   March 2012
Measuring The Kinetics and Activity of Adsorbed Proteins: In Vitro Lysozyme Deposited Onto Contact Lenses Over Short Time Periods
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Brad Hall
    School of Optometry,
    University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada
  • Lyndon Jones
    School of Optometry,
    University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada
  • James A. Forrest
    Department of Physics & Astronomy,
    University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  Brad Hall, None; Lyndon Jones, None; James A. Forrest, None
  • Footnotes
    Support  Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council (NSERC) of Canada
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science March 2012, Vol.53, 6125. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Brad Hall, Lyndon Jones, James A. Forrest; Measuring The Kinetics and Activity of Adsorbed Proteins: In Vitro Lysozyme Deposited Onto Contact Lenses Over Short Time Periods. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2012;53(14):6125.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract
 
Purpose:
 

To develop a process to measure the biological activity of an intact layer of adsorbed lysozyme at the surface of hydrogel contact lens materials.

 
Methods:
 

We use this technique to measure the time dependent amount and activity of adsorbed lysozyme on a number of commercial contact lens biomaterials during the first 2 hours of protein interaction with the material surface. The quantity of adsorbed lysozyme is measured using standard radiolabeled protein. The activity of the surface adsorbed protein is measured using a standard micrococcal activity assay, with extra steps to distinguish between protein on the surface and protein in solution. We use the measured quantities in our experiment to estimate a total layer activity.

 
Results:
 

The amount of active protein is essentially independent of the total protein, and is similar to what one would expect from monolayer coverage. We calculate the amount for a theoretical monolayer of lysozyme on a contact lens to be 692-1035ng, depending on the orientation of lysozyme, and thus can calculate a percentage of active lysozyme in a surface layer for each lens type. The percent of active lysozyme for senofilcon A, lotrafilcon B, and comfilcon A were 3-4, 4-5, and 2-3 percent respectively. Balafilcon A had the highest percent activity in a surface layer for all the silicone hydrogels tested at 30-45 percent. Etafilcon A was the only conventional hydrogel tested and showed 78-117 percent activity in a surface layer of lysozyme, which was the highest of all lens materials tested.

 
Conclusions:
 

This study has established an effective technique to evaluate the activity of an intact lysozyme coating on a biomaterial. Our results show that protein can rapidly deposit and can rapidly lose its biological function on biomaterials in as little as 10 seconds of protein-surface interaction. Despite the simplicity of the technique, to the best of our knowledge this is the first report quantifying the biological activity of an intact layer of surface-adsorbed protein on hydrogel materials.  

 
Keywords: contact lens • protein structure/function 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×