March 2012
Volume 53, Issue 14
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   March 2012
Molecular Surveillance of Contact Lenses, Cases, and Solutions for the Presence of Free-Living Amoeba Among Patients with Infectious Keratitis
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Ryan Young
    Ophthalmology, Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, Miami, Florida
  • Harry Flynn
    Ophthalmology, Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, Miami, Florida
  • Jorge Maestre-Mesa
    Ophthalmology, Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, Miami, Florida
  • Eduardo C. Alfonso
    Ophthalmology, Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, Miami, Florida
  • Darlene Miller
    Ophthalmology, Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, Miami, Florida
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  Ryan Young, None; Harry Flynn, None; Jorge Maestre-Mesa, None; Eduardo C. Alfonso, None; Darlene Miller, None
  • Footnotes
    Support  Research to Prevent Blindness, NEI Core Grant P30-EY14801
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science March 2012, Vol.53, 6171. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Ryan Young, Harry Flynn, Jorge Maestre-Mesa, Eduardo C. Alfonso, Darlene Miller; Molecular Surveillance of Contact Lenses, Cases, and Solutions for the Presence of Free-Living Amoeba Among Patients with Infectious Keratitis. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2012;53(14):6171.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose: : To determine the prevalence of free-living amoeba among patients’ contact lenses, cases, and solutions and to compare multiplex PCR with standard culture techniques in the detection of free-living amoeba among patients with infectious keratitis.

Methods: : We evaluated the efficacy of a multiplex PCR assay for the detection of free-living amoeba (Acanthamoeba, Vahlkampfia, Naegleria, and Hartmanella) and compared PCR results with cultures of 187 contact lenses and lens cases and 47 contact lens solutions collected within the last 5 years.

Results: : Free-living amoeba were isolated in 27 of 187 contact lenses and cases by combined PCR and culture techniques, for an overall prevalence of 14.4%. 10 cases of amoeba (9 verified Acanthamoeba and one unidentified free-living amoeba) were identified by culture techniques alone (5.3%), while 17 cases of amoeba (8 Acanthamoeba and 9 Hartmanella) were identified by multiplex PCR (9.1%) (Χ2 = 12.213, p = 0.0005). The sensitivity and specificity of culture, using PCR as the gold standard, were 23.5% and 96.5%, respectively. Acanthamoeba was isolated in one of 47 contact lens solutions by PCR, for a prevalence of 2.1%. All cultures of contact lens solutions were negative for free-living amoeba. Among the 187 patients with contact lenses and cases cultured, 42 had corneal cultures done, of which 5 were positive for Acanthamoeba for a prevalence of 11.9%. Three of the 5 cases were confirmed by cultures of contact lenses and cases. No cases of Vahlkampfia or Naegleria were identified in this study.

Conclusions: : Acanthamoeba and Hartmanella were more frequently isolated by PCR than by traditional culture techniques. Multiplex PCR assay is a useful adjunct to standard culture techniques for the detection of free-living amoeba in contact lenses, cases, and solutions in patients with recalcitrant infectious keratitis. Hartmanella may be a more frequent cause of amoebic keratitis than previously recognized in South Florida.

Keywords: Acanthamoeba • keratitis • contact lens 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×