March 2012
Volume 53, Issue 14
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   March 2012
Multicenter Comparison of Loteprednol 0.5% vs Prednisilone Acetate 1% in patients Post-Phacoemulsifaction with IOL implants
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Carlos Buznego
    General & Surgical Ophthal, Center for Excellence in EyeCare, Miami, Florida
  • Gabriela Perez
    Ctr for Excellence in Eye Care, Miami, Florida
  • William Trattler
    Cornea, Center For Excellence in Eye Care, Miami, Florida
  • Joseph A. Khell
    Ophthalmology/Cornea, Center for Excellence in Eyecare, Miami, Florida
  • Bonnie Henderson
    Boston Eye Surgery and Laser Center, Boston, Massachusetts
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  Carlos Buznego, Alcon (E, C), Allergan (E, C), Bausch & Lomb (E, C), ISTA (E, C); Gabriela Perez, None; William Trattler, None; Joseph A. Khell, None; Bonnie Henderson, Bausch & lomb (F)
  • Footnotes
    Support  Bausch & Lomb
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science March 2012, Vol.53, 6270. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Carlos Buznego, Gabriela Perez, William Trattler, Joseph A. Khell, Bonnie Henderson; Multicenter Comparison of Loteprednol 0.5% vs Prednisilone Acetate 1% in patients Post-Phacoemulsifaction with IOL implants. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2012;53(14):6270.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose: : The study was a prospective, multicenter comparative trial evaluating the effectiveness of Loteprednol 0.5% vs Prednisilone Acetate 1% for patients undergoing cataract surgery

Methods: : The study was conducted as a prospective, masked evaluation of cataract surgery patients who received either Loteprednol 0.5% or brand-name Pred Forte (Prednisilone Acetate 1%). The patients were prescribed either loteprednol or prednisilone acetate, along with brand name bromfenac BID and besivance 0.6% BID starting 3 days before surgery. The topical steroid as well as topical NSAID was continued for 4 weeks postop. Besifloxacin was continued for 10 days postop. Outcome measures included change in CCT, UCVA in patients who ended up on target for distance (Spherical equivelant of -0.5 to +0.5, with 0.75 D of astigmatism or less, BSCVA, AC cell scores, IOP at 1 day, 1 week, and 1 month post-Op, as well as macular thickness as measured by high resolution OCT.

Results: : 31 subjects were enrolled in group A of the study and 34 were in enrolled in group B. 36% of the subjects in group A were male while 50% were male in Group B. Compared to preop, subjects in group A experienced an increase in CCT of 58, 15, and 4 microns at 1 day, 1 week and 1 month, respectively. Subjects in group B experienced an increase in CCT from pre-Op of 25, 16, and 5 microns at 1 day, 1 week and 1 month, respectively. 79% and 78.6% of subjects in group A and 90% and 94.4% of subjects in group B had a UCVA of 20/30 or better at 1 week and 1 month, respectively. 100% of patients in group A and 96.7% of patients in group B had a BSCVA of 20/30 or better at 1 week. At 1 month, 100% of patients in both groups had a BSCVA of 20/30 or better. Average AC cell scores at 1 week averaged 0.95 cells in group A and 0.82 cells in group B. Elevations in IOP (>21 mmHg) were noted in one patient only in group B at 1 month.

Conclusions: : Subjects in groups A and B fared equally in regards to BSCVA of 20/30 or better at 1 week and 1 month post-Op. Patients in group B had a lower increase corneal thickness at 1 day, and achieved a higher percentage of eyes with an UCVA of 20/30 or better at 1 week and 1 month post-Op.

Clinical Trial: : http://www.clinicaltrials.gov NCT01193504

Keywords: inflammation 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×