March 2012
Volume 53, Issue 14
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   March 2012
Outcomes of Scleral Buckle Removal Combined with Prophylactic Laser Retinopexy
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Mohammed Khuthaila
    Retina, Wills Eye Institute, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
  • Mahta Rasouli
    Ophthalmology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
  • Marc Spirn
    Retina, Wills Eye Institute, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
  • Sunir J. Garg
    Retina, Wills Eye Institute, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
  • Mark Greve
    Ophthalmology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
  • Matthew Tennant
    Ophthalmology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
  • Jason Hsu
    Retina, Wills Eye Institute, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  Mohammed Khuthaila, None; Mahta Rasouli, None; Marc Spirn, None; Sunir J. Garg, None; Mark Greve, None; Matthew Tennant, None; Jason Hsu, None
  • Footnotes
    Support  None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science March 2012, Vol.53, 6356. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Mohammed Khuthaila, Mahta Rasouli, Marc Spirn, Sunir J. Garg, Mark Greve, Matthew Tennant, Jason Hsu; Outcomes of Scleral Buckle Removal Combined with Prophylactic Laser Retinopexy. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2012;53(14):6356.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose: : To determine whether intra-operative laser retinopexy at the time of scleral buckle removal decreases the rate of recurrent retinal detachment.

Methods: : Retrospective, non-randomized, cohort study. All patients known to have had scleral buckle removal from Wills Eye Institute and University of Alberta from 2000 to 2011 were identified. Additional inclusion criteria were the initial diagnosis of primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment requiring scleral buckle surgery and minimum follow-up of 6 months after buckle removal. The exclusion criteria were the absence of clinical documentation or lack of follow-up.

Results: : Eighty-eight patients met criteria for inclusion in this study. Primary indications for scleral buckle removal were extrusion (75%, n=66), diplopia (7.9%, n=7), infection (6.8%, n=6), a combination of extrusion and infection (5.7%, n=5), and others (4.5%, n=4). Duration of implant significantly differed by type, with patients in the Band group having the shortest duration of implant (52 months, range 1-403 month), and those with Band plus Segment having the longest (114 months, range 7-285 months) (p=0.003). The group that received laser retinopexy at the time of scleral buckle removal had a re-detachment rate of 2.2%, whereas the group that did not receive laser had a re-deatchment rate of 4.6%. Using the Fisher exact test, we found no significant difference between the two (p=0.61).

Conclusions: : Both groups had a low rate of recurrent retinal detachment after scleral buckle removal. Prophylactic laser did not appear to significantly reduce the rate of recurrent retinal detachment.

Keywords: retinal detachment • vitreoretinal surgery • sclera 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×