March 2012
Volume 53, Issue 14
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   March 2012
Relationship of Structural and Functional Asymmetry to Sleep Position in Primary Open Angle Glaucoma
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Eberechi Nwogu
    Ophthalmology,
    Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
  • Sonya Thomas
    Ophthalmology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
  • Cecily Hamill
    Ophthalmology,
    Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
  • Inna Marcus
    Ophthalmology and Visual Science,
    Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
  • Nils A. Loewen
    Ophthalmology & Visual Science,
    Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  Eberechi Nwogu, None; Sonya Thomas, None; Cecily Hamill, None; Inna Marcus, None; Nils A. Loewen, None
  • Footnotes
    Support  Yale One-Year Student Research Fellowship and Mentoring for the Advancement of the Physician Scientist Grant
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science March 2012, Vol.53, 6368. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Eberechi Nwogu, Sonya Thomas, Cecily Hamill, Inna Marcus, Nils A. Loewen; Relationship of Structural and Functional Asymmetry to Sleep Position in Primary Open Angle Glaucoma. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2012;53(14):6368.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose: : To test whether sleep position correlates with visual field asymmetry in low pressure (LPG) and high pressure (HPG) open angle glaucoma. LPG patients have more frequent asymmetric visual field loss and a predominance of left sided loss when compared with HPG patients, but no asymmetric risk factors have been identified to this date.

Methods: : 50 LPG and 178 HPG patients were identified via chart review and the visual field index (VFI) was calculated for the most recent reliable exam with the Humphrey Visual Field Analyzer II-i with Guided Progression Analysis. The retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) measures (average RNFL thickness and RFNL symmetry) were obtained from the most recent OCT Cirrus exam. Applying the Low Pressure Glaucoma Treatment Study Group (LoTGS) criteria, an untreated pressure of less than 22 mmHg was defined as LPG. Participants completed a survey about their sleep position which characterized their position as predominantly side, prone, supine or unknown. Patients who chose side as their primary position were further characterized as sleeping mostly on the right side (n=71), left side (n=59) or both sides (n=47). The Mann-Whitney test was applied.

Results: : Right sided sleepers had a significantly larger VFI difference (right VFI - left VFI) (17.06 vs 10.85, p=0.009) and a lower right RNFL thickness (68.94 vs 75.81, p=0.005) than left sided sleepers. When compared to all non-right sided sleepers, right sided sleepers also had a larger VFI difference (17.06 vs 12.80, p=0.021), lower right RFNL thickness (68.94 vs 74.97, p=0.003) and lower RFNL symmetry (53.73 vs 62.29, p=0.039). In the subgroup analysis, HPG patients with right dominant sleep position had a greater VFI difference (16.20 vs 12.48, p=0.052) and lower right RFNL thickness (68.64 vs 75.46, p=0.003) than non-right sided sleepers. The same trend was seen among right sided sleepers versus left sided sleepers respectively (15.98 vs 11.23, p=0.054 and 69.31 vs 77.48, p=0.02). Among LPG patients, right sided sleepers had a greater VFI difference than left sided sleepers (19.21 vs 9.27, p = 0.030). Also right sided sleepers had a lower RNFL symmetry than non-right sided sleepers (45.33 vs 63.34, p=0.025).

Conclusions: : Right sided sleeping is related to a greater VFI and RNFL asymmetry in LPG and HPG.

Keywords: visual fields • nerve fiber layer • clinical (human) or epidemiologic studies: risk factor assessment 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×