March 2012
Volume 53, Issue 14
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   March 2012
Long Term Complications and Visual Outcomes of Anterior Chamber versus Posterior Chamber Intraocular Lens Implants after Phacoemulsification in Patients with Uveitis
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Jonathan N. Kruh
    Ophthalmology, Ocular Immunology & Uveitis Foundation, Cambridge, Massachusetts
  • Ana M. Suelves
    Ophthalmology, Ocular Immunology & Uveitis Foundation, Cambridge, Massachusetts
  • C Stephen Foster
    Ophthalmology, Ocular Immunology & Uveitis Foundation, Cambridge, Massachusetts
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  Jonathan N. Kruh, None; Ana M. Suelves, None; C Stephen Foster, None
  • Footnotes
    Support  None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science March 2012, Vol.53, 6687. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Jonathan N. Kruh, Ana M. Suelves, C Stephen Foster; Long Term Complications and Visual Outcomes of Anterior Chamber versus Posterior Chamber Intraocular Lens Implants after Phacoemulsification in Patients with Uveitis. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2012;53(14):6687.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose: : To analyze the visual outcomes and long-term complication rates in patients with quiescent uveitis after having had phacoemulsification with subsequent placement of either an anterior chamber or posterior chamber intraocular lens implant.

Methods: : This is a retrospective cohort study, which includes the analysis of 36 uveitic eyes that underwent phacoemulsification and lens implantation between October 2005 and October 2010.The 2 cohorts were defined based on their past ocular history of having had phacoemulsification surgery with placement of either an anterior chamber intraocular lens (ACIOL) or a posterior chamber intraocular lens (PCIOL). Each group included 18 eyes from 18 different patients, and was age-matched. Baseline past ocular history, postoperative complications and visual acuity of both groups were compared. SPSS 15.0 was used for the statistical analysis.

Results: : Average follow up was 36.11 months+/- 17.3 in the AC-IOL group and 53.72 months +/- 20.4 in the PC-IOL group (p=0.047, paired Wilcoxon test). No statistical differences were noted in baseline characteristics (sex, race, uveitis localization and etiology) between both groups.Patients with PCIOL implants had a greater risk for developing posterior capsule opacification (odds ratio: 0.071; 95% CI: 0.010; 0.488). A higher risk of early rise of intraocular pressure, deposits on lens, reactivation of uveitis and need for lens explantation was observed in the AC-IOL group, but these differences were not statistically significant. The mean preoperative logMAR best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was 1.49+/- 1.07 in the AC-IOL group and 0.5+/- 0.26in the PC-IOL group. Both groups had a significant improvement of visual acuity after surgery (p< 0.01).

Conclusions: : AC-IOL implantation due to lack of capsular support in uveitic eyes was well tolerated with no statistically significant increase in the long-term complication rate. Both groups had a significant improvement in BCVA. Posterior chamber implants had a significantly higher risk for the development of posterior capsule opacification.

Keywords: cataract • uveitis-clinical/animal model • intraocular lens 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×