March 2012
Volume 53, Issue 14
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   March 2012
Scheimpflug Evaluation of a Dual Ophthalmic Viscosurgical Device (OVD) Injection Technique for Cataract Surgery
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Stina Nilsson
    R & D, Abbott Medical Optics (AMO), Uppsala, Sweden
  • Bjorn Lundgren
    R & D, Abbott Medical Optics (AMO), Uppsala, Sweden
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  Stina Nilsson, AMO Uppsala AB (E); Bjorn Lundgren, AMO Uppsala AB (E)
  • Footnotes
    Support  None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science March 2012, Vol.53, 6720. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Stina Nilsson, Bjorn Lundgren; Scheimpflug Evaluation of a Dual Ophthalmic Viscosurgical Device (OVD) Injection Technique for Cataract Surgery. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2012;53(14):6720.

      Download citation file:

      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

  • Supplements

The softshell technique, with injection of a dispersive OVD close to the cornea, and a cohesive OVD beneath is a commonly used technique. A disadvantage is that the dispersive OVD may be captured in the anterior chamber (AC) angle and cause postoperative IOP spikes. An opposite injection order is suggested to reduce this and was the focus of this study. The purpose was to visualize and evaluate the distribution of the OVDs for two product combinations, the Healon OVD + Healon Endocoat OVD (Abbott Medical Optics Inc.) and DuoVisc (Provisc + Viscoat, Alcon Inc.).


Cataract surgery was simulated ex vivo in pig eyes (10 eyes per product combination). AC distribution of fluorescein stained OVDs was evaluated before surgery, after injection of cohesive OVD, after dispersive OVD, and after phacoemulsification by Scheimpflug photography (Pentacam HR, Oculus).


The Scheimpflug images visualize the dual OVD distribution within the AC in a unique way. Capsulorrhexis and hydrodissection were done with only cohesive OVD in AC. Injection of dispersive OVD, at site of rhexis, resulted in filling the entire AC depth but leaving the cohesive OVD in the AC angles. Phacoemulsification resulted in variable degree of retention of OVDs for both product combinations. In some cases it was possible to keep the AC filled with dual OVDs. In most eyes the cohesive OVD was emulsified, while the remaining dispersive OVD stayed centrally during the entire phaco procedure. In half of the cases all or almost all OVD was gone when lens was completely removed. No significant difference was seen between the two product combinations.


This study shows that an injection of the cohesive OVD (Healon OVD or Provisc OVD) first prevents the dispersive OVD to be captured in the AC angle. Training and optimization of phaco settings is recommended before this injection technique may be a good alternative to the soft shell technique.  

Keywords: cataract • anterior chamber • intraocular pressure 

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.