March 2012
Volume 53, Issue 14
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   March 2012
ERK1/2 Signaling is Required for Lens Cell Survival and Fiber Cell Differentiation during Development
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Dinesh Upadhya
    Ophthalmology, Mason Eye Institute, Columbia, Missouri
  • Lixing Reneker
    Ophthalmology, Mason Eye Institute, Columbia, Missouri
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  Dinesh Upadhya, None; Lixing Reneker, None
  • Footnotes
    Support  NIH Grant EY13146 and Research to Prevent Blindness (RPB)
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science March 2012, Vol.53, 6907. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Dinesh Upadhya, Lixing Reneker; ERK1/2 Signaling is Required for Lens Cell Survival and Fiber Cell Differentiation during Development. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2012;53(14):6907.

      Download citation file:

      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

  • Supplements

Purpose: : Accumulated evidence has shown that FGFRs play a key role in vertebrate lens development. FGFR can activate multiple downstream signal transduction pathways. The contribution of individual signaling event to lens development is not entirely clear. We know that ERK1 is dispensable for lens development and ERK2 is required for cell proliferation at the lens germinative zone. The present work was designed to study the role of ERK1/2 in lens development.

Methods: : Erk2 conditional knockout (Erk2CKO) mice were first generated by using Erk2-flox alleles and the Le-cre driver. Erk1/2 double knockout (Erk1/2DKO) mice were generated by breeding the Erk2CKO mice into the Erk1-/- background. Lens development in the Erk1/2DKO mice was compared to WT mice by histology and immunostaining to investigate the changes in lens cell proliferation, differentiation, and survival.

Results: : Erk1/2 deletion did not affect lens induction and Pax-6 expression, but caused severe lens hypoplasia. Apoptosis was dramatically increased in the lens of Erk1/2DKO mice, a major defect also seen in the LeCre-Fgfr1/2 and MLR10Cre-Fgfr1/2/3 conditional knockoutmice. In contrast to the WT lens at E12.5, the prospective primary fiber cells in Erk1/2DKO lens lack cell elongation, remained in the columnar shape and continued to express cell proliferation markers. However, α, β and γ crystallin expression was detected in a few primary fiber cells at the center of the Erk1/2DKO lens at E14.5. Evidently, secondary fiber cell differentiation was completely abolished in the Erk1/2DKO lens. The fiber differentiation defects in the Erk1/2DKO mice closely resemble those in the MLR10Cre-Fgfr1/2/3 triple conditional knockout mice, suggesting that ERK1/2-signaling activated by FGFRs is essential for lens fiber differentiation. Furthermore, loss of ERK1/2 in the lens severely decreased but did not eliminate cell proliferation, suggesting that other signaling activity may also be involved in regulating cell proliferation.

Conclusions: : ERK1/2 activation is not required for lens induction but is essential for cell survival and fiber differentiation during lens development. Our results suggest that, from the lens pit stage onward, the function of FGFR in lens cell survival and differentiation is mainly mediated through the ERK1/2 signaling.

Keywords: development • transgenics/knock-outs • genetics 

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.