April 2011
Volume 52, Issue 14
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   April 2011
Grading of Lid-Parallel Conjunctival Folds by Novice and Experienced Observers
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Heiko Pult
    School of Optometry and Vision Sciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom
    Optometry & Vision Research, Weinheim, Germany
  • Britta Riede-Pult
    Optometry & Vision Research, Weinheim, Germany
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  Heiko Pult, None; Britta Riede-Pult, None
  • Footnotes
    Support  None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science April 2011, Vol.52, 3739. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Heiko Pult, Britta Riede-Pult; Grading of Lid-Parallel Conjunctival Folds by Novice and Experienced Observers. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2011;52(14):3739.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract
 
Purpose:
 

Strong relationships between dry eye symptoms and severity of lid parallel conjunctival folds (LIPCOF) are reported. This study investigates (i) intra-observer repeatability and (ii) inter-observer differences in novice and experienced observers classifying LIPCOF and (iii) the ability to differentiate between LIPCOF and micro-folds by fold thickness.

 
Methods:
 

45 images of LIPCOF and micro-folds were projected onto a TFT screen in randomized order and classified by two experienced observers (O1/O2) and two novice observer (ON1/ON2) in two consecutive sessions. 95% limits of agreement were calculated from the distributions of differences between observer and observations. Limits of agreement were compared using O`Briens Test of homogeneity of variances. Differences between LIPCOF and micro-folds were evaluated by digital analyses and analyzed by unpaired t-test.

 
Results:
 

The mean LIPCOF grades evaluated by the four observers, were not significantly different (ANOVA, p=0.560) (Table 1). Intra-observer 95% limit of agreement (LoA) for O1 (LoA=0.8) and O2 (LoA=0.9) were similar (p=0.589); however LoA of ON1/ON2 was significantly larger (p=0.001; LoAON1=1.5; LoAON2=2.3). Inter-observers LoA was smaller in experienced observers (O1-O2=1.7; O1-ON1=1.7; O1-ON2=2.1; O2-ON1=2.2; O2-ON2=2.0; ON1-ON2=2.0 (Session II)), but not significantly different (p>0.294). LIPCOF were significant (unpaired t-test; p<0.0019) thicker (0.078mm) than micro-fold (0.024mm).  

 
Conclusions:
 

Intra-observer limit of agreement was better than the inter-observer limit of agreement. Experience in the classification of LIPCOF increases repeatability. Any change within observations of more than 0.9 should to be considered as abnormal. LIPCOF can easily be differentiated from micro-folds by comparing thickness, since they are three times thicker.

 
Keywords: clinical research methodology 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×