April 2011
Volume 52, Issue 14
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   April 2011
Dark-adapted Rods Do Not Suppress Mesopic Rod Flicker Detection
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Yolanda H. Lu
    Surgery, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois
  • Dingcai Cao
    Surgery, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  Yolanda H. Lu, None; Dingcai Cao, None
  • Footnotes
    Support  R01EY019651 (D. Cao)
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science April 2011, Vol.52, 4906. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Yolanda H. Lu, Dingcai Cao; Dark-adapted Rods Do Not Suppress Mesopic Rod Flicker Detection. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2011;52(14):4906.

      Download citation file:

      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

  • Supplements

Purpose: : It is reported that dark-adapted rods inhibit cone flicker detection. If at mesopic light levels, rod signals are transmitted via the rod-cone gap junction pathway, dark-adapted rods should also suppress rod-mediated flicker detection. To test this, mesopic critical fusion frequencies (CFFs) for the isolated rod and cone stimuli were measured in the presence of various surround illuminances covering scotopic to mesopic illuminance range.

Methods: : The stimuli (a 2° circular field within a 6° surround) were presented at 6.5° temporal retina in a four-primary photostimulator that can independently control rod and cone stimulations. Isolated rod or cone luminance signals in the center field were modulated sinusoidally at 30% contrast with a time-average illuminance of 2, 20, and 200 Td. CFFs of the isolated rod or cone stimuli were measured with various surrounding illuminance levels that were dimmer than the center.

Results: : Rod CFFs at 2, 20 and 200 Td or cone CFFs at 2 Td did not vary with different surround illuminances. Cone CFFs at 200 Td remains constant for scotopic surround illuminances (≤ 0.02 Td) but increased monotonically at surround light levels above 0.2 Td. Compared with equal illuminance surround, the scotopic surrounds reduced cone CFFs by 4-10 Hz. At 20 Td, cone CFFs had similar patterns to those at 200 Td, except the overall CFFs were lower and the reduction in CFFs due to dim surround was smaller (2-4 Hz).

Conclusions: : Dark-adapted rods only suppress cone-mediated flicker detection at higher light levels, but not rod-mediated flicker detection. These results can be understood in terms of impulse response function (IRF), with lateral suppression only occurring when the amplitude of IRF is high and the time-to-peak is short.

Keywords: color vision • retina • temporal vision 

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.