April 2011
Volume 52, Issue 14
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   April 2011
Biochemically Modified Surfaces as a Fixation Concept for Epiretinal Stimulator Arrays: First Results of in-vivo Implantation in Rabbits
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Gernot Roessler
    Dept of Ophthalmology,
    RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany
  • Doris Klee
    Dept of Textile and Macromolecular Chemistry,
    RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany
  • Wilfried Mokwa
    Dept of Materials in Electrical Engineering,
    RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany
  • Babac A. Mazinani
    Dept of Ophthalmology,
    RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany
  • Christian Koch
    Dept of Materials in Electrical Engineering,
    RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany
  • Bernd Sellhaus
    Dept of Neuropathology,
    RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany
  • Gabriele Thumann
    Dept of Ophthalmology,
    RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany
  • Peter Walter
    Dept of Ophthalmology,
    RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  Gernot Roessler, None; Doris Klee, None; Wilfried Mokwa, None; Babac A. Mazinani, None; Christian Koch, None; Bernd Sellhaus, None; Gabriele Thumann, None; Peter Walter, None
  • Footnotes
    Support  IZKF Biomat Grant TV-B 116
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science April 2011, Vol.52, 4939. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Gernot Roessler, Doris Klee, Wilfried Mokwa, Babac A. Mazinani, Christian Koch, Bernd Sellhaus, Gabriele Thumann, Peter Walter; Biochemically Modified Surfaces as a Fixation Concept for Epiretinal Stimulator Arrays: First Results of in-vivo Implantation in Rabbits. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2011;52(14):4939.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose: : To develop an alternative fixation procedure for epiretinal stimulators as an alternative to the conventional fixation using retinal tacks.

Methods: : Polyimide microstructures were coated with different protein configurations by immobilizing laminin peptide composites onto the surface. Implantation was performed in rabbits including vitrectomy and the positioning of the structures onto the retinal surface. After an observation period of three months the eyes were enucleated for histopathological examination.

Results: : Using one additional retinal tack at one edge of the microstructures led to tight connection of the entire dummy microstructures at the posterior pole of the rabbits’ eyes. In cases where the positioning was performed without an additional tack fixation the dummy structures did not remain at the posterior pole. In one case with additional tack fixation the microstructure showed tight contact although the tack was not detectable at the fixation site during the follow-up examinations.

Conclusions: : Our first results of in-vivo implantation show that basically a tight contact of the modified microstructures with the retinal surface could be achieved. However, the necessity of a temporary additional tack fixation implies that a certain period of time needs to be bypassed until the biochemical fixation takes effect completely. Moreover, experiments in animal models which a more similar to the human eye could be helpful to investigate the relevance of this problem while the design of an entirely implanted prosthesis including the transscleral fixation of the receiver and the built-in stress of the stimulator cable may provide a certain temporary fixation.

Keywords: retinal degenerations: hereditary • vitreoretinal surgery • Muller cells 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×