April 2011
Volume 52, Issue 14
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   April 2011
The Visual Field Index (VFI) Behaves Erratically Near the Advanced Field Loss Mean Deviation Value
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Lauren E. Doss
    Jules Stein Eye Institute, UCLA, Los Angeles, California
    Jules Stein Eye Institute, UCLA Geffen School of Medicine, California
  • Dennis Mock
    Jules Stein Eye Institute, UCLA Geffen School of Medicine, California
  • Allan Kwong
    Jules Stein Eye Institute, UCLA Geffen School of Medicine, California
  • Yahya Shaikh
    Jules Stein Eye Institute, UCLA Geffen School of Medicine, California
  • Anne L. Coleman
    Jules Stein Eye Institute, UCLA Geffen School of Medicine, California
  • Kouros Nouri-Mahdavi
    Jules Stein Eye Institute, UCLA Geffen School of Medicine, California
  • Joseph Caprioli
    Jules Stein Eye Institute, UCLA Geffen School of Medicine, California
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  Lauren E. Doss, None; Dennis Mock, Oppenheimer Research Grant (F); Allan Kwong, None; Yahya Shaikh, None; Anne L. Coleman, Research to Prevent Blindness (F); Kouros Nouri-Mahdavi, None; Joseph Caprioli, Research to Prevent Blindness (F)
  • Footnotes
    Support  None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science April 2011, Vol.52, 5495. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Lauren E. Doss, Dennis Mock, Allan Kwong, Yahya Shaikh, Anne L. Coleman, Kouros Nouri-Mahdavi, Joseph Caprioli; The Visual Field Index (VFI) Behaves Erratically Near the Advanced Field Loss Mean Deviation Value. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2011;52(14):5495.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract
 
Purpose:
 

We evaluated the global visual field indices mean deviation (MD) and visual field index (VFI) in glaucoma patients to observe the behavior of VFI around MD values of -20 dB.

 
Methods:
 

We collated the visual field indices in eyes from patients whose visual field (VF) time series had two consecutive VFs where the MD values had changed from less than to greater than -20.9 decibels or vice versa. We only considered cases where the patient’s age (from the 1st to the 2nd test) stayed within the age-matched normal decile to systematically eliminate any change seen in the MD due to a change from the age-normal values alone. The visual field index (VFI) and mean deviation (MD) values were calculated with StatPacTM.

 
Results:
 

The VF indices from consecutive visual field readings (n=33 pairs) had an average time period difference of 0.69±0.6 years. The average absolute difference between the pairs for MD and VFI were 3.4±2.9 dB and 26.6%±12%, respectively. The Figure is a scatterplot showing the relationship between the two differences, with boxplots showing the range of values. The red box shows those points whose MD changed by less than 2.0 MD (mean dB=1.3 +0.4 dB) with the change in VFI (mean =15.7 + 4.5%).

 
Conclusions:
 

A method to estimate the rate of visual progression in glaucoma, VFI, has been reported. Here we detect a drastic change in VFI when shifting from a MD greater than -20 dB to a MD less than -20 dB. Specifically, if a 100% drop in VFI roughly corresponds to a mean deviation defect of -30dB, then the slope is in the magnitude of 3.3% drop per -1dB. However, here we see a 3x-10x magnification change in slope sensitivity near the -20dB cutoff. A linear regression of the VFI has been suggested to represent the global visual field rate of progression; however it should be noted that a large change or discontinuity in slope may occur for calculating the VFI around MDs of -20dB boundary.  

 
Keywords: visual fields 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×