April 2011
Volume 52, Issue 14
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   April 2011
Diagnostic Vitreous Biopsy with Small-gauge Vitrectomy Instrumentation
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Shaival S. Shah
    Ophthalmology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa
  • Ryan M. Tarantola
    Ophthalmology, Univ of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, Iowa
  • Jordan M. Graff
    Ophthalmology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa
  • James C. Folk
    Ophthalmology, Univ of Iowa Hospitals & Clinics, Iowa City, Iowa
  • H C. Boldt
    Ophthalmology, Univ of Iowa Hosp & Clinics, Iowa City, Iowa
  • Karen M. Gehrs
    Center For Retina and Macular Disease, Winter Haven, Florida
  • Stephen R. Russell
    Ophthalmology, Univ of Iowa Hospitals & Clinics, Iowa City, Iowa
  • Vinit B. Mahajan
    Ophthalmology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  Shaival S. Shah, None; Ryan M. Tarantola, None; Jordan M. Graff, None; James C. Folk, None; H. C. Boldt, None; Karen M. Gehrs, None; Stephen R. Russell, None; Vinit B. Mahajan, None
  • Footnotes
    Support  Research to Prevent Blindness
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science April 2011, Vol.52, 5603. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Shaival S. Shah, Ryan M. Tarantola, Jordan M. Graff, James C. Folk, H C. Boldt, Karen M. Gehrs, Stephen R. Russell, Vinit B. Mahajan; Diagnostic Vitreous Biopsy with Small-gauge Vitrectomy Instrumentation. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2011;52(14):5603.

      Download citation file:

      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

  • Supplements

Purpose: : To review outcomes of diagnostic vitreous biopsy performed with small-gauge vitrectomy instrumentation in cases of endophthalmitis.

Methods: : Retrospective case series. Cases of endophthalmitis with presumed infectious etiology that underwent diagnostic vitrectomy with either 23-gauge or 25-guage instrumentation were assembled from a 4-year period. Demographic data, preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative exam records were reviewed. The culture-positive rate, causative organism, and visual outcome were collected.

Results: : Thirty infectious endophthalmitis cases managed with small-gauge vitrectomy were identified. The indication for vitrectomy included post-cataract endophthalmitis (7/30), bleb-related endophthalmitis (7/30), post-steroid implant/injection endophthalmitis (5/30), endogenous endophthalmitis (4/30), post-intravitreal injection endophthalmitis (4/30), post-keratoplasty endophthalmitis (2/30) and seton tube exposure endophthalmitis (1/30). Biopsies were culture positive in 12/30 cases. The most frequent organisms were coagulase-negative Staphlococci. Other organisms included Staphylococcus Aureus, Streptococcus species, Fusarium, Candida Albicans, Aspergillus. Average follow-up was 6.8 months (range 1 month to 2 years). Preoperative visual acuity ranged from 20/80 to light perception. Final postoperative visual acuity ranged from 20/20 to LP with the best outcomes in post-cataract cases and the worst in bleb-related and endogenous endophthalmitis cases. Additional surgery was required in 4 cases.

Conclusions: : Although small-gauge vitrectomy instrumentation may provide some technical advantages, visual outcome remains dependent on clinical setting and infectious agent. Further studies are needed to determine whether positive culture rates are comparable to those achieved with 20-guage instrumentation. Interestingly, intravitreal injections are emerging as a common indication for diagnostic vitrectomy.

Keywords: endophthalmitis • vitreoretinal surgery 

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.