April 2011
Volume 52, Issue 14
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   April 2011
Adaptation to Multifocal Intraocular Lens: Factors Contributing to Satisfaction
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Victoria Pelak
    Neurology & Ophthalmology,
    UC Denver School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado
  • Erik Anderson
    Neurology & Ophthalmology,
    UC Denver School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado
  • Emily Hager
    Neurology,
    UC Denver School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado
  • Barbetta Halliday
    Neurology,
    UC Denver School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado
  • Michael Taravella
    Ophthalmology,
    UC Denver School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  Victoria Pelak, None; Erik Anderson, None; Emily Hager, None; Barbetta Halliday, None; Michael Taravella, None
  • Footnotes
    Support  None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science April 2011, Vol.52, 5676. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Victoria Pelak, Erik Anderson, Emily Hager, Barbetta Halliday, Michael Taravella; Adaptation to Multifocal Intraocular Lens: Factors Contributing to Satisfaction. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2011;52(14):5676.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose: : To identify factors that contribute to patient satisfaction and adaptation to cataract extraction (CE) with multifocal intraocular lens (MFIOL) implants.

Methods: : We assessed visual satisfaction of 84 patients who underwent uncomplicated CE with MFIOL implantation. Logistic regression was used to identify variables associated with visual satisfaction. Variables assessed included: age, gender, pre-operative best eye visual acuity, post-operative cylinder, post-operative spherical equivalent, eyes implanted (one or two), weeks out from surgery, and model type.

Results: : 6.7% of patients were dissatisfied with their visual function after CE with MFIOL. None of the variables evaluated were significantly associated with satisfaction.

Conclusions: : Factors other than basic demographics, time after surgery, pre-operative visual acuity, post-operative refractive error, eyes implanted, and model type likely contribute to adaptation and visual satisfaction with MFIOL. Further research to identify factors potentially prohibiting adequate neuroadaptation and visual satisfaction, such as higher cortical visual function, is important for the prevention of poor outcomes after MFIOL.

Keywords: cataract • intraocular lens • treatment outcomes of cataract surgery 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×