April 2011
Volume 52, Issue 14
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   April 2011
Risk Factors For Corneal Haze Formation Following Surface Ablation
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Sarah E. Eccles Brown
    Ophthalmology Program, Wilford Hall Medical Center, San Antonio, Texas
  • Charles D. Reilly
    Ophthalmology Program, Wilford Hall Medical Center, San Antonio, Texas
  • Vasudha A. Panday
    Ophthalmology Program, Wilford Hall Medical Center, San Antonio, Texas
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  Sarah E. Eccles Brown, None; Charles D. Reilly, None; Vasudha A. Panday, None
  • Footnotes
    Support  None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science April 2011, Vol.52, 5743. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Sarah E. Eccles Brown, Charles D. Reilly, Vasudha A. Panday; Risk Factors For Corneal Haze Formation Following Surface Ablation. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2011;52(14):5743.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose: : To evaluate possible risk factors for corneal haze formation following surface ablation procedures including Fitzpatrick skin type, race/ethnicity, history of smoking, exposure to sandy/windy environments, average time spent outside during daylight hours and the percentage of that time spent with and without sunglasses.

Methods: : The Joint Warfighter Refractive Surgery Center database was reviewed from Jan 2001 to Jan 2009 including 25,313 patients. Of these, 150 patients with greater than mild haze were identified. A matched control group without haze was created based on age, gender, treatment spherical equivalent, steroid amount and taper length. A telephone survey was conducted to gather information regarding the proposed possible risk factors. Inclusion criteria included active duty military receiving elective surgery during the specified time that were assigned to the haze or control group and elected to participate in the survey. Exclusion criteria included patients who elected to not participate in the survery, gross deviation from steroid taper, pregnant/nursing, use of MMC. The data was analyzed using logistic regression, chi square, two sample z test, and a Mann/Whitney test for p- values with SAS version 9.1.

Results: : Excellent visual outcomes were noted in both the haze and control groups. While there was little difference between the haze and control groups in the 6 month postop UCVA and BSCVA, the BSCVA Low Contrast is worse in the haze than the control group. Fitzpatrick skin type, race, smoking history, windy/sandy environment exposure, and average daily hours outside overall did not have any statistically significant differences between the haze and control groups. There was a statistically significant difference in the percent of time wearing sunglasses while outside, with the control group wearing protection 86.76% of the time compared to 78.11% in the haze group (p= 0.006).

Conclusions: : Traditional risk factors for haze may be more important than race, smoking or environmental exposure. Higher use of sunglasses is correlated with a lower incidence of haze. Prospective studies should be performed to validate these results.

Keywords: refractive surgery: complications • refractive surgery: PRK • refractive surgery 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×