April 2011
Volume 52, Issue 14
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   April 2011
Refractive Optimization After Keratoplasty
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Matthew Wade
    UC Irvine, Irvine, California
  • Roger Steinert
    UC Irvine, Irvine, California
  • Marjan Farid
    UC Irvine, Irvine, California
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  Matthew Wade, None; Roger Steinert, AMO (C); Marjan Farid, None
  • Footnotes
    Support  None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science April 2011, Vol.52, 5749. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Matthew Wade, Roger Steinert, Marjan Farid; Refractive Optimization After Keratoplasty. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2011;52(14):5749.

      Download citation file:

      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

  • Supplements

Purpose: : Evaluate the results of different methodologies to correct high amounts of astigmatism after penetrating keratoplasty.

Methods: : Patients with high astigmatism after penetrating keratoplasty were treated with astigmatic keratotomy, femtosecond flap(IntraLase) conventional or wavefront guided LASIK (VISX), or a toric intraocular lens (ReSTOR)The primary outcome measure was the change in pre-operative verses post-operative astigmatism. Simulated keratometry measurements were obtained from either the Pentacam (Oculus) or the Orbscan (Bausch & Lomb). Outcomes were stratified by modality of correction. Statistical comparisons were made using the paired t-test.

Results: : A total of 14 eyes from 11 patients have been studied to date. Distribution of procedures was as follows: LASIK (n=2), AK alone (n=4), toric IOL alone (n=6), combined toric IOL and AK (n=2). Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation in units of diopters (D). The following analyses group the refractive procedures together. Prior to refractive correction the manifest cylinder was 4.6 ± 2.9 D. After refractive procedures the manifest cylinder was significantly less than baseline at month 1 (2.8 ± 3.1 D, p=0.013) and month 2 (2.9 ± 2.7 D, p=0.008). Simulated cylinder also showed a statistically significant decrease from baseline (5.7 ± 2.7 D) compared with post operative month 1 (1.8 ± 3.1, p=0.0003) and month 2 (1.4 ± 3.4, p=0.049). There are currently too few subjects to statistically compare between modalities.

Conclusions: : Refractive procedures resulted in a significant decrease in cylinder (both manifest and simulated) at post-operative months 1 and 2. More data are required to make further conclusions or to compare individual procedures. These data are currently being collected. The results of this study have the potential to guide surgeon use of refractive procedures in the treatment of post-keratoplasty astigmatism.

Keywords: refractive surgery: comparative studies 

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.