April 2011
Volume 52, Issue 14
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   April 2011
Asymmetric Hypopigmentation in Albinism
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Magella M. Neveu
    Moorfields Eye Hospital, London, United Kingdom
  • John J. Sloper
    Moorfields Eye Hospital, London, United Kingdom
  • Anthony T. Moore
    Moorfields Eye Hospital, London, United Kingdom
  • Glen Jeffery
    Institute of Ophthalmology, University College London, London, United Kingdom
  • Graham E. Holder
    Moorfields Eye Hospital, London, United Kingdom
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  Magella M. Neveu, None; John J. Sloper, None; Anthony T. Moore, None; Glen Jeffery, None; Graham E. Holder, None
  • Footnotes
    Support  None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science April 2011, Vol.52, 6086. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Magella M. Neveu, John J. Sloper, Anthony T. Moore, Glen Jeffery, Graham E. Holder; Asymmetric Hypopigmentation in Albinism. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2011;52(14):6086.

      Download citation file:

      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

  • Supplements

Purpose: : To present nine patients with uniocular intra-cranial misrouting of the type that is usually associated with albinism.

Methods: : Nine patients suspected of ocular (n=3)/oculocutaneous (n=6) albinism with asymmetrical inter-ocular fundal pigmentation were ascertained (age range 5 - 52 yrs, 5 female, 4 male). VEPs to pattern appearance (PappVEP) and flash (FVEP) stimulation were recorded using 5 active electrodes across the occiput. VEPs were analysed in terms of amplitude and peak time. ERGs and when possible, fundus photography and OCTs were also performed. Fundal pigmentation was assessed using fundus photography and foveal morphology using OCT.

Results: : Four of nine patients had foveal hypoplasia in the less/minimally pigmented eye and a normal fovea in the fellow eye; 2 of 9 patients had bilateral foveal hypoplasia. Five patients had bilateral iris transillumination and 5 patients had nystagmus. All ERGs were normal from both eyes. Five of 9 patients had fundus photography. All showed asymmetrical pigmentation and pigment distribution differed between eyes. Retinal blood vessel patterns differed between eyes with the less/minimally pigmented eye having abnormal vasculature. In all patients, FVEP and/or PappVEPs from the less/minimally pigmented eye showed clear contralateral predominance. FVEP and/or PappVEPs from the more pigmented eye were normal.

Conclusions: : All patients have the features of ocular/oculocutaneous albinism but the characteristic intra-cranial misrouting of the visual pathways is confined to only one eye, and appears to be related to the degree of pigment deposition in the retinal pigment epithelium demonstrated on fundus photography. This reveals that the influence of melanin deposition on chiasmal decussation during development is independent between eyes, and thus may result in uniocular misrouting. Further, this shows that chiasm formation in man does not depend on stereo-typic midline interactions between the two optic nerves as both ‘normal’ and ‘abnormal’ chiasmatic pathways from separate eyes can develop in the same individual.

Keywords: electrophysiology: clinical • visual development • retinal pigment epithelium 

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.