April 2011
Volume 52, Issue 14
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   April 2011
Ocular Complications Of Misplaced Intraocular Lens Haptics
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Breno R. Lima
    Ophthalmology, Cleveland Clinic/Cole Eye Institute, Cleveland, Ohio
  • Brandy Hayden
    Ophthalmology, Cleveland Clinic/Cole Eye Institute, Cleveland, Ohio
  • Jonathan Eisengart
    Ophthalmology, Cleveland Clinic/Cole Eye Institute, Cleveland, Ohio
  • Careen Y. Lowder
    Ophthalmology, Cleveland Clinic/Cole Eye Institute, Cleveland, Ohio
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  Breno R. Lima, None; Brandy Hayden, None; Jonathan Eisengart, None; Careen Y. Lowder, None
  • Footnotes
    Support  Supported by an Unrestricted Grant from Research to Prevent Blindness.
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science April 2011, Vol.52, 6227. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Breno R. Lima, Brandy Hayden, Jonathan Eisengart, Careen Y. Lowder; Ocular Complications Of Misplaced Intraocular Lens Haptics. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2011;52(14):6227.

      Download citation file:

      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

  • Supplements

Purpose: : To review the clinical features, management and ultrasound biomicroscopy (UBM) findings of patients presenting with misplaced intraocular lens haptics.

Methods: : UBM using a 50-MHz probe was performed in fourteen pseudophakic eyes, clinically suspected to have misplaced intraocular lens haptics. Patients were referred to our institution from May 2009 through September 2010, due to chronic postoperative inflammation, recurrent hyphema, increased intraocular pressure (IOP) or recurrent vitreous hemorrhage or a combination of those. The position of the intraocular lens haptics and their relationships to the surrounding anterior segment structures were determined. Clinical presentation and management of each patient were further reviewed.

Results: : Time from cataract surgery to referral/diagnosis of misplaced haptics by UBM ranged from 2 to 144 months (mean 57 ± 48 months). Seven patients (50%) had sulcus-implanted intraocular lens and seven (50%) had an in-the-bag intraocular lens. Six patients (42.8%) had a history of chronic post-operative inflammation. Five patients (35.7%) had recurrent episodes of hyphema. Elevated IOP was found in nine eyes (64.8%). A history of recurrent vitreous hemorrhages was elicited in eight patients (57.1%). Intraocular lens haptics misplacement was confirmed by UBM in all suspected cases. In twelve eyes, at least one haptic was embedded in or touching the iris. Haptic extension into the ciliary body process was observed in two patients, and into the pars plana in another. Focal iris thinning/atrophy was detected by UBM in three cases. Focal angle closure associated with haptic misplacement was found in four eyes. Intraocular lens exchange was performed in four cases. Out of the nine patients who presented with elevated IOP, seven had it controlled with topical IOP-lowering medications. Two patients were maintained on cycloplegics and topical steroids.

Conclusions: : Ultrasound biomicroscopy is a valuable tool in confirming the clinical suspicion of misplacement of the lens haptics and haptic-induced ocular irritation after cataract surgery. This disorder may remain undiagnosed for several months, mimicking other conditions. Imaging findings, along with the presenting features, are essential in assisting the physician in the decision-making process of management of these patients.

Keywords: uveitis-clinical/animal model • inflammation • intraocular lens 

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.