April 2011
Volume 52, Issue 14
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   April 2011
Evaluation of Accommodative Performance in Children with Unilateral Amblyopia
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Vivian Wong
    Optometry, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana
  • Angela Chen
    Southern California College of Optometry, Fullerton, California
  • Susan A. Cotter
    Pediatric Optometry, Southern Calif Coll of Optometry, Fullerton, California
  • Kristina Tarczy-Hornoch
    Ophthalmology, Children's Hospital of Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
  • Tawna L. Roberts
    Optometry, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana
  • Don Lyon
    Optometry, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana
  • T. Rowan Candy
    Optometry, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  Vivian Wong, None; Angela Chen, None; Susan A. Cotter, None; Kristina Tarczy-Hornoch, None; Tawna L. Roberts, None; Don Lyon, None; T. Rowan Candy, None
  • Footnotes
    Support  NIH Grants R01 014460 & P30 EY019008
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science April 2011, Vol.52, 6343. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Vivian Wong, Angela Chen, Susan A. Cotter, Kristina Tarczy-Hornoch, Tawna L. Roberts, Don Lyon, T. Rowan Candy; Evaluation of Accommodative Performance in Children with Unilateral Amblyopia. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2011;52(14):6343.

      Download citation file:

      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

  • Supplements

Purpose: : To evaluate the accuracy of binocular and monocular accommodation in children with unilateral amblyopia compared to a typically-developing age-matched cohort.

Methods: : Subjects between 3 and 10 years of age with treated or untreated unilateral amblyopia (A) and an age-matched group of typically-developing children (TD) had their accommodation measured in their habitual refractive state using an automated Nott retinoscopy system. They viewed a cartoon presented on an LCD screen at 2, 3, and 4 diopter stimulus positions. Accommodative response functions (ARF) were plotted for each eye under binocular and monocular viewing conditions. The slopes of the ARF and average accommodative lag across the three stimulus positions were derived. The mean between-eye difference in slope and the mean between-eye difference in average lag under binocular viewing conditions were compared with monocular viewing, to control for any effects of uncorrected or partially corrected refractive error. Statistical analyses were adjusted with Bonferroni correction.

Results: : The mean difference in slope between the eyes was not significantly different across binocular and monocular conditions for either A (p=0.32) or TD subjects (p=1.00). The mean difference in lag between the eyes was significant for A subjects (mean diff. = 0.31 D monoc>binoc; p=0.04), but not for TD subjects (p=0.20).

Conclusions: : Amblyopic children demonstrated higher relative lags of accommodation in their amblyopic eyes under monocular conditions than binocular conditions, but exhibited equal ARF slope differences. TD subjects demonstrated equal differences in accommodative lags and ARF slopes for the two viewing conditions. Therefore, the potential impact of increased blur due to high monocular lag in the amblyopic eye under monocular viewing conditions should be considered during patching therapy.

Keywords: amblyopia • accommodation • visual development 

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.