April 2009
Volume 50, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   April 2009
Is Angle Pattern of an Arteriovenous Crossing a Risk Factor in Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion?
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Q. Liang
    Ophthalmology, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
  • D. Wong
    Ophthalmology, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  Q. Liang, None; D. Wong, None.
  • Footnotes
    Support  None.
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science April 2009, Vol.50, 100. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Q. Liang, D. Wong; Is Angle Pattern of an Arteriovenous Crossing a Risk Factor in Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion?. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2009;50(13):100.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose: : To analyze the angle patterns of the arteriovenous crossings as a risk factor in branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO).

Methods: : 84 eyes of 84 patients with BRVO at an arteriovenous crossing on the superotemporal or inferotemporal vessel arcades were retrospectively studied in a tertiary care hospital. In 79 of the 84 study eyes, a corresponding arteriovenous crossing on the opposite temporal arcade was found and served as control group 1. In 81 of the 84 fellow eyes without BRVO, a corresponding arteriovenous crossing in the same arcade was found and served as control group 2. The angles between artery and vein of the arteriovenous crossings in vein occlusion side were measured on the fluorescein angiographic images, color and red free fundus photographs. The angle patterns were classified as type 1 (0° < angles < 60°) and type 2 (60° ≤ angles ≤ 90°) (Fig. 1). The percentages of each type of angle were compared between study and the two control groups.

Results: : There were 80% (67/84) type1 and 20% (17/84) type 2 angles in the study group. In control group 1, 61% (48/79) were type 1 and 39% (31/79) were type 2 angles whereas in control group 2, there were 48% (39/81) type 1 and 52% (42/81) type2 angles. There was statistically significant difference between the study group and control group 1 (P<0.01) and control group 2 (P<0.001).

Conclusions: : Smaller angles (type 1) appear more frequently than larger angles (type 2) in BRVO, suggesting the angle pattern may be a risk factor in BRVO. Angle pattern may affect vector portion of artery blood flow against venous blood flow and cause hemodynamic change of venous flow (Fig. 1). Further study is necessary to investigate the quantitative correlation between the exact degree of the angle and occurrence of BRVO.

Keywords: clinical (human) or epidemiologic studies: risk factor assessment 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×