April 2009
Volume 50, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   April 2009
Pegaptanib Sodium versus Macular Laser Photocoagulation for Diabetic Macular Edema
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • A. V. Bux
    Ophthalmology, University of Foggia, Foggia, Italy
  • G. Querques
    Ophthalmology, University of Foggia, Foggia, Italy
  • A. R. Fusco
    Hygiene, University of Bari, Bari, Italy
  • C. Iaculli
    Ophthalmology, University of Foggia, Foggia, Italy
  • N. Delle Noci
    Ophthalmology, University of Foggia, Foggia, Italy
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  A.V. Bux, None; G. Querques, None; A.R. Fusco, None; C. Iaculli, None; N. Delle Noci, None.
  • Footnotes
    Support  None.
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science April 2009, Vol.50, 188. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      A. V. Bux, G. Querques, A. R. Fusco, C. Iaculli, N. Delle Noci; Pegaptanib Sodium versus Macular Laser Photocoagulation for Diabetic Macular Edema. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2009;50(13):188.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose: : To report the short-term anatomic and functional outcomes after primary intravitreal pegaptanib sodium in patients with diabetic macular edema (DME).

Methods: : We conduced a retrospective outcome analysis, by optical coherence tomography and best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), of eyes with DME treated with primary intravitreal pegaptanib sodium (Macugen) (intravitreal pegaptanib group). These results were compared with the ones of eyes treated with primary macular laser photocoagulation (macular laser photocoagulation group).

Results: : A total of 56 eyes of 56 patients with a minimum of 6 months’ follow-up were included for analysis. For the intravitreal pegaptanib group (26 eyes) we found significant changes in mean BCVA and reductions in mean central macular thickness (CMT) compared with baseline at the last follow-up visit (p < .05). For the macular laser photocoagulation group (30 eyes), we found no statistically significant changes in mean BCVA and CMT compared with baseline at the last follow-up visit.

Conclusions: : The short-term outcomes suggest that primary intravitreal pegaptanib treatment may be superior to macular laser photocoagulation in patients affected with DME.

Keywords: diabetic retinopathy • laser • imaging methods (CT, FA, ICG, MRI, OCT, RTA, SLO, ultrasound) 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×