April 2009
Volume 50, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   April 2009
Cost-Effectiveness of Treatment of Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration in the United States: A Cost-Utility Study Using a Microsimulation Approach
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • D. Vollman
    Ophthalmology, Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri
  • S. M. Kymes
    Ophthalmology, Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri
  • M. A. Brantley
    Ophthalmology, Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  D. Vollman, None; S.M. Kymes, Pfizer, Allergan, C; M.A. Brantley, None.
  • Footnotes
    Support  Research to Prevent Blindness, Inc.; NIH Vision Core Grant P30 EY 02687
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science April 2009, Vol.50, 273. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      D. Vollman, S. M. Kymes, M. A. Brantley; Cost-Effectiveness of Treatment of Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration in the United States: A Cost-Utility Study Using a Microsimulation Approach. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2009;50(13):273.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose: : Neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD), also called choroidal neovascularization (CNV), is the leading cause of blindness in the United States and most developed nations. Photodynamic therapy (PDT) has been shown to slow progression in people with predominantly classic CNV. More recently, anti-VEGF therapy has also been shown to be effective with pegaptanib (Macugen®) slowing progression, and ranibizumab (Lucentis®) reversing the disease process in some patients. We examine the cost-effectiveness of these treatments for AMD using standards of care in vitreoretinal practice in the United States.

Methods: : We constructed a Markov decision analytic model and evaluated the model using a microsimulation approach. The model was populated with data from the TAP, VISION, ANCHOR, and MARINA trials. As PDT is only approved for use in people with PC lesions, we examined treatment of people with PC lesions in one model, and treatment of those with any lesion separately. The model for treatment of PC lesions compared treatment with PDT, pegaptanib, and ranibizumab; and the second considered only pegaptanib and ranibizumab. We report the incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICER) for both models.

Results: : The improved efficacy of ranibizumab results in an average gain of 0.78 QALYs for people with PC lesions coming at a cost of $69,000 over the same lifetime (above the cost of Macugen), resulting in an ICER of $88,462/QALY when compared to Macugen. In the any CNV lesion model, the superior efficacy of ranibizumab again results in a gain in lifetime QALYs, 1.16. However, this gain again comes at a relatively high cost, $96,000, resulting in an ICER of $82,759/QALY.

Conclusions: : Of the three available treatments for neovascular macular degeneration, only ranibizumab results in a reversal of the degenerative process. However, our analyses indicate that the premium required for this medication exceeds most commonly accepted standards of cost-effectiveness.

Keywords: clinical (human) or epidemiologic studies: health care delivery/economics/manpower • age-related macular degeneration 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×