April 2009
Volume 50, Issue 13
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   April 2009
Is Fluorescein Breakup Due to Quenching or Tangential Flow?
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • P. E. King-Smith
    Optometry, Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio
  • J. J. Nichols
    Optometry, Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio
  • K. K. Nichols
    Optometry, Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  P.E. King-Smith, None; J.J. Nichols, None; K.K. Nichols, None.
  • Footnotes
    Support  NIH Grant EY015519 to K.K. Nichols
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science April 2009, Vol.50, 529. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      P. E. King-Smith, J. J. Nichols, K. K. Nichols; Is Fluorescein Breakup Due to Quenching or Tangential Flow?. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2009;50(13):529.

      Download citation file:

      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

  • Supplements

Purpose: : One assumption about fluorescein breakup is that it corresponds to "tangential flow" of the tear film away from the region of breakup, thus removing fluorescein from this region. We describe a method to test an alternative possibility that fluorescein is still present in the same amount (mass/area) and that evaporation causes "quenching" (reduced fluorescent efficiency) due to increase in fluorescein concentration.

Methods: : Fluorescent efficiency is nearly independent of concentration at low concentrations, but falls rapidly within increasing concentration above a "critical concentration" of about 0.2% (Webber & Jones, 1986). Thus evaporation should reduce efficiency and fluorescence when the concentration of fluorescein in the tear film is high, but should have little effect for concentrations below 0.2%.

Results: : The figure compares fluorescence decay with high (1 uL of 10% instilled) and low (0.25 uL of 2%) fluorescein concentrations; the subject was a 68 year old white male with meibomian gland dysfunction who shows rapid, linear tear film thinning by interferometry. (Transient changes in the first 2 s after the blink are thought to be related to the upward movement of the lipid layer after a blink, causing tangential flow of the tear film.) Initial concentrations, just after the blink, were expected to be above and below the critical concentration respectively. Thus for the high concentration, increasing concentration due to evaporation should cause quenching and a rapid reduction in fluorescence. For the low concentration, there should be little quenching and fluorescence decay at first, until the concentration increases to above the critical concentration.

Conclusions: : In this example, the observed fluorescence decays are consistent with the predictions based on increased concentration from evaporation causing quenching at relatively high concentrations. They are not consistent with tangential flow out of the measurement area which should cause similar decay curves for both high and low fluorescein concentrations. Thus a study of fluorescence decay using high and low fluorescein concentrations can be used to analyze the contributions of evaporation and tangential flow to tear film thinning and breakup.

Keywords: cornea: tears/tear film/dry eye • imaging/image analysis: clinical • optical properties 

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.