April 2009
Volume 50, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   April 2009
Effect of Increasing the Diameter of the PRESBYLENS® Intracorneal Inlay for the Correction of Presbyopia
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • T. B. Porter
    ReVision Optics, Lake Forest, California
  • N. Schneider
    ReVision Optics, Lake Forest, California
  • A. Lang
    ReVision Optics, Lake Forest, California
  • K. Holliday
    ReVision Optics, Lake Forest, California
  • T. Miller
    ReVision Optics, Lake Forest, California
  • A. Le
    ReVision Optics, Lake Forest, California
  • A. Vatz
    ReVision Optics, Lake Forest, California
  • D. Johnson
    ReVision Optics, Lake Forest, California
  • E. Barragan
    Laser Ocular Hidalgo, Monterrey, Mexico
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  T.B. Porter, ReVision Optics, E; N. Schneider, ReVision Optics, E; A. Lang, ReVision Optics, E; K. Holliday, ReVision Optics, E; T. Miller, ReVision Optics, E; A. Le, ReVision Optics, E; A. Vatz, ReVision Optics, E; D. Johnson, ReVision Optics, E; E. Barragan, Laser Ocular Hidalgo, E; ReVision Optics, C.
  • Footnotes
    Support  None.
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science April 2009, Vol.50, 594. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      T. B. Porter, N. Schneider, A. Lang, K. Holliday, T. Miller, A. Le, A. Vatz, D. Johnson, E. Barragan; Effect of Increasing the Diameter of the PRESBYLENS® Intracorneal Inlay for the Correction of Presbyopia. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2009;50(13):594.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose: : Visual acuity outcomes are presented for two presbyopia-correcting intracorneal inlays. The objective was to determine the optimal inlay design to provide good near vision while minimally affecting distance vision.

Methods: : 16 emmetropic, presbyopic subjects (mean age 50 years [46 to 54], mean preop spherical equivalent 0.16 D [-0.25 to 0.75], mean near add 1.77 D [1.50 to 2.5]) were randomly selected to be implanted, under standard LASIK-style flaps, with 1.5 or 2.0 mm diameter hydrogel intracorneal inlays of constant thickness. Subjects were screened for tolerance to monovision and the clinical test was conducted under an IRB-approved protocol. EDTRS visual acuity was measured at 40 cm (near) and 6 meters (distance).

Results: : In the treated eye, uncorrected near visual acuity improved in 100% of eyes. All eyes implanted with 2.0 mm inlays achieved 20/25 or better uncorrected near visual acuity compared to 50% 20/25 or better with 1.5 mm inlays, while no eyes achieved 20/40 or better vision preoperatively. The 2.0 mm inlay improved the near lines gained in the implant eye significantly better than the 1.5 mm inlay; the mean gain in lines of uncorrected near visual acuity was 3.23 [1.8 to 5.8] and 5.15 [4.4 to 6.0] respectively. There were no significant differences between inlay designs for uncorrected distance visual acuity and/or distance lines lost in the implant eye. Binocular uncorrected distance visual acuity did not significantly deteriorate post-operatively for any design and all patients could read the 20/25 line.

Conclusions: : This clinical test demonstrates that eyes implanted with 2.0 mm inlays performed significantly better at near than those treated with 1.5 mm inlays despite no significant differences being observed for distance vision.

Keywords: cornea: clinical science • refractive surgery: other technologies 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×