April 2009
Volume 50, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   April 2009
Evaluation of Signal Strength and Spectral Domain OCT Image Artifacts
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • C. Shieh
    Duke School of Medicine,
    Duke Universiy Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
  • I. C. Han
    Duke School of Medicine,
    Duke Universiy Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
  • G. J. Jaffe
    Duke Eye Center,
    Duke Universiy Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  C. Shieh, None; I.C. Han, None; G.J. Jaffe, None.
  • Footnotes
    Support  None.
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science April 2009, Vol.50, 1083. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      C. Shieh, I. C. Han, G. J. Jaffe; Evaluation of Signal Strength and Spectral Domain OCT Image Artifacts. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2009;50(13):1083.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose: : Signal strength is a parameter that combines signal to noise ratio (SNR) and the uniformity of the signal within an OCT scan. Many clinicians use signal strength to decide on the quality and utility of the OCT images. In this retrospective observational case series, we determined whether signal strength impacts the frequency and type of OCT artifacts.

Methods: : Records from patients who underwent an ophthalmologic evaluation by a member of the Duke University Eye Center vitreoretinal faculty (GJJ) and had a spectral domain OCT scan (Cirrus) produced between August 2007 and November 2007 were reviewed. The relationship between OCT scan artifacts and signal strength was determined for scans with signal strength of 4 or above, using the Spearman rank correlation.

Results: : Scans from 104 eyes were analyzed. Retinal scan algorithm errors and scan artifacts were identified in 85.53% of all eyes. Of these, the four most common -- inner retinal misidentification (75%), outer retinal misidentification (60.57%), out of register (36.53%) and degraded image artifact (33.65%) were identified in 84.61 % of all eyes. Other artifacts were also identified but were not included due to the small proportion.The Spearman’s rank correlation of signal strength and inner retinal misidentification was [[Unsupported Character - Codename &shy;]]0.36 (p<0.001). For outer retinal misidentification, r= -0.06 (p=0.528); for degraded, r = -0.41 (<0 .001), and for out of register, r =0.04 (p=0.70). The Spearman’s rank correlation of signal strength and all four artifacts was -0.30 (p=0.002).

Conclusions: : Cirrus spectral domain artifacts occurred frequently, and were minimally to moderately associated inversely with signal strength. However, artifacts were seen in scans with high signal strength, and relatively artifact-free scans were observed with low signal strength. Signal strength is not an optimal method to assess OCT scan quality.

Keywords: imaging methods (CT, FA, ICG, MRI, OCT, RTA, SLO, ultrasound) • imaging/image analysis: clinical • image processing 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×