April 2009
Volume 50, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   April 2009
Intravitreal VEGF Values and Inflammatory Parameters - Rationale and Clinical Results of an Individualized Combination-treatment of Wet AMD
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • A. J. Augustin
    Ophthalmology, Klinikum Karlsruhe, Karlsruhe, Germany
  • J. Kirchhof
    Ophthalmology, Klinikum Karlsruhe, Karlsruhe, Germany
  • J. Lutz
    Physiology, University of Wuerzburg, Wuerzburg, Germany
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  A.J. Augustin, None; J. Kirchhof, None; J. Lutz, None.
  • Footnotes
    Support  None.
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science April 2009, Vol.50, 953. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      A. J. Augustin, J. Kirchhof, J. Lutz; Intravitreal VEGF Values and Inflammatory Parameters - Rationale and Clinical Results of an Individualized Combination-treatment of Wet AMD. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2009;50(13):953.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose: : To evaluate intravitreal VEGF values and inflammatory markers as well as the efficacy and safety of combination therapy with verteporfin photodynamic therapy (PDT), a corticosteroid, and bevacizumab in CNV secondary to wet AMD.

Methods: : In 98 consecutive patients suffering from proliferative diabetic retinopathy or wet AMD intravitreal VEGF values and inflammatory markers have been measured. Patients (n=46) with idiopathic macular pucker or macular holes served as controls. Wet AMD: We report on a prospective, non-comparative, interventional case series which included 146 patients suffering from wet AMD. All lesion types and sizes have been included. All patients received a PDT with a reduced light dose. About 16 hours after PDT bevacizumab (1.5 mg) was applied intravitreally. Patients with fibrosis received 4 mg of triamcinolone, those without fibrosis received dexamethasone. Patients attended follow-up visits every 6 weeks, undergoing VA and intraocular pressure measurement, slit-lamp and ophthalmoscopic examination, and optical coherence tomography. Fluorescein angiography was performed every 3 months or earlier if OCT showed significant edema.

Results: : Intravitreal VEGF values and inflammatory parameters were significantly (P<0.01) elevated in both, diabetic and AMD patients with a higher variability in AMD patients. In the treatment group all patients received one triple therapy cycle (9 patients received a second triple treatment due to remaining CNV activity). The triple therapy was complemented in 46 patients by an additional intravitreal injection of bevacizumab. The mean follow-up period was 53 weeks. Mean increase in visual acuity was 1.65 lines (P<0.01). Mean decrease in retinal thickness was 149 µm (P<0.01). There was no significant difference between those patients with fibrosis or without fibrosis. No serious adverse events have been observed.

Conclusions: : The findings on both, the biochemical and clinical results further support the concept of triple therapy. When comparing the results in eyes with subretinal fibrosis with previous series a longer lasting steroid seems to be favourable in this lesion subtype. A prospective evaluation of these results is mandatory.

Keywords: inflammation • choroid: neovascularization • diabetic retinopathy 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×