April 2009
Volume 50, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   April 2009
Area Under the Modular Transfer Function Curve Does Not Predict Convolved E Image Quality
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • D. Compertore
    Optical Metrology, Bausch & Lomb, Rochester, New York
  • A. Kingston
    Optical Metrology, Bausch & Lomb, Rochester, New York
  • I. Cox
    Optical Metrology, Bausch & Lomb, Rochester, New York
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  D. Compertore, Bausch and Lomb, E; A. Kingston, Bausch and Lomb, E; I. Cox, Bausch and Lomb, E.
  • Footnotes
    Support  None.
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science April 2009, Vol.50, 1554. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      D. Compertore, A. Kingston, I. Cox; Area Under the Modular Transfer Function Curve Does Not Predict Convolved E Image Quality. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2009;50(13):1554.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose: : The purpose of this analysis was to examine and relate the area under the curve modular transfer function (MTF) values and convolved E image quality for a set of intraocular lens designs.

Methods: : A series of intraocular lens (IOL) designs representing single vision spherical and aspheric lenses were modeled in ZemaxTM. The ZemaxTM model consisted of a 43 D paraxial cornea and the IOL. The intraocular lens designs all used commonly used optical surfaces that could be lathed or molded using current technology. A set of area under the curve MTF values were recorded for different object positions, and related to convolved single letter images representing a 20/20 Snellen letter. Observers subjectively ranked the convolved E’s on a scale of 1 to 3 with 1 being best image quality.

Results: : Image quality for the convolved E’s differed noticeably for the series of test designs. The conventional assumption is that a larger area under the curve MTF value indicates better image quality. However, in this standard set of 3 intraocular lenses better E’s as ranked by 3 observers were associated with lower area under the curve MTF values 42% of the times.

Conclusions: : Area under the MTF curve alone is not an absolute predictor of image quality.

Keywords: optical properties • aberrations • intraocular lens 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×