April 2009
Volume 50, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   April 2009
Intraobserver and Interobserver Reproducibility in the Evaluation of Optic Disc and Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer by Rtvue Fourier-Domain Optovue
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • F. Bertuzzi
    Centro Glaucoma-Clinica Oculistica, Policlinico di Monza, Monza (Milano), Italy
  • S. Bochicchio
    Centro Glaucoma-Clinica Oculistica, Policlinico di Monza, Monza (Milano), Italy
  • F. Verga
    Centro Glaucoma-Clinica Oculistica, Policlinico di Monza, Monza (Milano), Italy
  • R. Angeli
    Clinica Oculistica, Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy
  • M. Suzani
    Clinica Oculistica, Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy
  • E. Rulli
    Istituto Mario Negri, Milano, Italy
  • S. Miglior
    Centro Glaucoma-Clinica Oculistica, Policlinico di Monza, Monza (Milano), Italy
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  F. Bertuzzi, None; S. Bochicchio, None; F. Verga, None; R. Angeli, None; M. Suzani, None; E. Rulli, None; S. Miglior, Zeiss, Heidelberg , Optovue, C.
  • Footnotes
    Support  None.
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science April 2009, Vol.50, 2262. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      F. Bertuzzi, S. Bochicchio, F. Verga, R. Angeli, M. Suzani, E. Rulli, S. Miglior; Intraobserver and Interobserver Reproducibility in the Evaluation of Optic Disc and Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer by Rtvue Fourier-Domain Optovue. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2009;50(13):2262.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose: : To assess intraobserver and interobserver reproducibility of morphometric measurements on optic disc and retinal nerve fiber layer in glaucoma (POAG), ocular hypertensive(OHT) and normal subjects by means of RTVue Fourier-Domain OCT. Study

Results: : ICC showed worst scores on rim (0.02 to 0.48) and nerve head (-0.01 to 0.17)volume in all of the calculations. Best scores were found on RNFL related parameters (0.94 to 1),either on intraobserver-interimage or interobserver-intra/interimage evaluations. The CL drawing system did not affect reproducibility of these parameters. The parameters cup-disc horizontal and vertical ratio showed substantial to very good correlation (0.67 to 0.88) both in intra- and interoperator evaluation, except when the 3D baseline CL was used. In general, in all of the evaluations, the 3D baseline CL drawing had worse scores than OCT and video-baseline drawing systems. Interimage (33.3 to 47,2% parameters ICC > 0.7) showed a higher variability than intraimage (50% parameters ICC > 0.7) evaluation.

Conclusions: : Measurement of RNFL parameters by means of RTVue is highly reproducible and slightly operator-dependent. Optic nerve head measurements are less reproducible and more operator-dependent than RNFL values. 3D baseline showed higher variability than OCT and video-baseline. Since the intra-image comparison gives the best ICC scores, image acquisition is more a source of variability than contour line drawing.

Keywords: imaging methods (CT, FA, ICG, MRI, OCT, RTA, SLO, ultrasound) • optic disc • imaging/image analysis: clinical 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×