April 2009
Volume 50, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   April 2009
Comparison of Ranibizumab vs. Bevacizumab in Treatment of Exudative AMD
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • J. M. Verre
    Ophthalmology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin
  • J. E. Kim
    Ophthalmology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin
  • M. Ranade
    Ophthalmology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin
  • D. J. Covert
    Ophthalmology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  J.M. Verre, None; J.E. Kim, None; M. Ranade, None; D.J. Covert, None.
  • Footnotes
    Support  Research to Prevent Blindness
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science April 2009, Vol.50, 2380. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      J. M. Verre, J. E. Kim, M. Ranade, D. J. Covert; Comparison of Ranibizumab vs. Bevacizumab in Treatment of Exudative AMD. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2009;50(13):2380.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose: : To compare the efficacy of ranibizumab (Lucentis) with bevacizumab (Avastin) in treatment of exudative age-related macular degeneration (AMD).

Methods: : A retrospective, comparative case series. Visual acuity at 6 months and 12 months and the number of injections given during this follow up period were compared for the two groups who were treated on as needed basis according to the optical coherence tomography (OCT) findings.

Results: : A total of 56 eyes of 56 patients were included. The average age at baseline visit was 80.3 years (standard deviation [SD]: 8.1, range: 57-94). Thirty-four eyes were treated with Lucentis and 22 eyes with Avastin. For the Lucentis group, average age was 80.3 y (SD: 8.11, range: 63-94). Average visual acuity was 20/85 (range: 20/30 to 20/1000) at baseline, 20/86 (range: 20/25 to 20/1000) at six months, and 20/92 (range 20/25 to 3/200) at 12 months. The baseline visual acuity was not statistically different than viasual acuity at 6-month (p=0.98) or 12-month (p=0.36). The average number of injections given was 7.8 (SD: 2.7, range: 3-13). For the Avastin group, average age was 80.4 y (SD: 8.18, range: 57-91). Average visual acuity was 20/152 (range: 20/25 to hand motions at 2 ft) at baseline, 20/84 (range: 20/30 to 1/200) at six months, and 20/63 (range 20/25 to 20/500) at 12 months. The baseline visual acuity was not statistically different than at 6-month (p=0.09) or 12-month (p=0.09). The average number of injections given was 6.6 (SD: 1.6, range: 4-9). The average age was not statistically different between the groups (p=0.93). Visual acuities were not statistically different between the groups at baseline (p=0.14), 6 months (p=0.96), or 12 months (p=0.16).The number of injections given was not statistically different between the groups (p=0.066). OCT foveal thickness, 1mm thickness, and 1 mm volume measurements were improved and statistically different from baseline at 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months of follow up (all p-values < 0.03).

Conclusions: : There was no statistical difference between Lucentis and Avastin treated patients for AMD with regards to visual acuity or number of injections with 12 months of follow up in this small retrospective case series. OCT findings were improved over baseline at all follow up visits.

Keywords: age-related macular degeneration • drug toxicity/drug effects • retina 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×