April 2009
Volume 50, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   April 2009
Effect of Acute Intraocular Pressure Challenge on Inner Retinal Function in Diabetic Rats
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • V. H. Wong
    Department of Optometry & Vision Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia
  • B. V. Bui
    Department of Optometry & Vision Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia
  • A. J. Vingrys
    Department of Optometry & Vision Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  V.H. Wong, None; B.V. Bui, None; A.J. Vingrys, None.
  • Footnotes
    Support  NHMRC Grant 400127
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science April 2009, Vol.50, 2761. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      V. H. Wong, B. V. Bui, A. J. Vingrys; Effect of Acute Intraocular Pressure Challenge on Inner Retinal Function in Diabetic Rats. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2009;50(13):2761.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose: : We consider whether the diabetic rat retina is more susceptible to acute intraocular pressure (IOP) challenge.

Methods: : Electroretinogram (ERG) responses were measured in anaesthetized (60:5 mg/kg Ketamine:Xylazine) dark-adapted (>12 hours) adult Long-Evans rats 5 weeks following citrate buffer (n=6) or diabetes induction (streptozotocin, STZ, n=10, 65 mg/kg at 6 weeks of age, blood glucose: >15 mmol/L). Baseline IOP (mean±SEM) was measured using Tonopen. IOP challenge was produced with a staircase (10-100 mmHg, 5 mmHg increments every 3 min) after vitreal chamber cannulation. Non-cannulated eye acted as control. Blood pressure (mean±SEM) was measured using tail-cuff sphygmomanometer. At each IOP, dim and bright flash (-4.56, -1.72 log cd.s.m-2) ERGs were collected to give the scotopic threshold response (STR) and the rod b-wave, respectively. Amplitudes were expressed relative to baseline (%, 10 mmHg), and the change in function with IOP was described using a cumulative normal function. Non-parametric confidence limits (95% confidence limits, 2.5-97.5CL) for mean were bootstrapped. Two-tailed t-test was used to evaluate IOP and blood pressure at baseline.

Results: : Baseline IOP (control: 13.4±0.1 vs. STZ: 13.9±0.1 mmHg, P=0.68) and blood pressure (control: 118±15 vs. STZ: 114±5 mmHg, P=0.78) were similar. Cumulative normal functions fitted to the IOP-response revealed that the peak-to-peak amplitudes of the STR in STZ-treated animals returned a mean (60.4, CL 58.0-62.9 mmHg) that was significantly more sensitive to IOP challenge than control rats (69.3, CL 60.4-68.2) by ~9 mmHg. In contrast, the b-wave IOP-response was not different in diabetic rats (60.3, CL 58.0-62.7 mmHg) compared with controls (62.3, CL 60.0-64.5 mmHg).

Conclusions: : Ganglion cell function in diabetic eyes was more affected by acute IOP challenge compared with controls. This was not the case for the ON-bipolar cell dominated b-wave. This indicates for a selective ganglion cell susceptibility to IOP challenge in diabetic eyes.

Keywords: intraocular pressure • diabetes • electroretinography: non-clinical 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×