April 2009
Volume 50, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   April 2009
Prevalence of Mutations in BEST1 Gene in a Cohort of Patients With Presumed Best Disease
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • I. A. Meunier
    CHU Gui de Chauliac, Centre des Affections Sensorielles Rares, Montpellier, France
  • G. Manes
    CHU Gui de Chauliac, Centre des Affections Sensorielles Rares, Montpellier, France
  • B. Bocquet
    CHU Gui de Chauliac, Centre des Affections Sensorielles Rares, Montpellier, France
  • C. Arndt
    CHU Gui de Chauliac, Centre des Affections Sensorielles Rares, Montpellier, France
  • C. Hamel
    CHU Gui de Chauliac, Centre des Affections Sensorielles Rares, Montpellier, France
  • A. Sénéchal
    CHU Gui de Chauliac, Centre des Affections Sensorielles Rares, Montpellier, France
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  I.A. Meunier, None; G. Manes, None; B. Bocquet, None; C. Arndt, None; C. Hamel, None; A. Sénéchal, None.
  • Footnotes
    Support  None.
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science April 2009, Vol.50, 2810. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      I. A. Meunier, G. Manes, B. Bocquet, C. Arndt, C. Hamel, A. Sénéchal; Prevalence of Mutations in BEST1 Gene in a Cohort of Patients With Presumed Best Disease. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2009;50(13):2810.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose: : To determine the prevalence of BEST1 mutations in Best disease.

Methods: : Clinical, electrophysiological and molecular retrospective study.The database of an outclinic patient unit specialised in genetic sensory diseases was screened for patients with presumed Best disease. Thirty-two patients (20 families) were included. The 12 exons and flanking intron sequences of BEST1 were screened in the 20 unrelated probands. Three microsatellites markers flanking BEST1 were used for haplotyping analysis.

Results: : Best disease patients had a BEST1 mutation in half the cases (n=10 families), including one patient presenting multiple vitelliform deposits who was compound heterozygote, leading to the diagnosis of bestrophinopathy. In those patients with no BEST1 mutations (n=10 families), the Arden ratio was reduced in 6 of them. Members of a 3-generation family without BEST1 mutation showed consistent onset of the disease at age 20-25 and a normal EOG. In this family, segregation analysis of microsatellite markers excluded BEST1 as the causal gene.

Conclusions: : Vitelliform macular dystrophies could be classified in 3 subgroups: typical BD with BEST1 mutations and reduced EOG; Best-like dystrophy with no BEST1 mutation and normal EOG and cases with no BEST1 mutation but reduced EOG. The absence of mutations in BEST1 in some families suggests the implication of additional genes in Best disease.

Keywords: genetics • gene screening • retina 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×