April 2009
Volume 50, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   April 2009
Comparison of Goldmann Applanation Tonometry and Dynamic Contour Tonometry in Primary Open Angle Glaucoma
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • G. S. Regev
    Ophthalmology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana
  • A. Harris
    Ophthalmology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana
  • B. Siesky
    Ophthalmology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana
  • A. Moss
    Ophthalmology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana
  • L. Cantor
    Ophthalmology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana
  • D. WuDunn
    Ophthalmology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana
  • Y. Catoira-Boyle
    Ophthalmology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana
  • J. Abrams
    Ophthalmology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana
  • R. Ehrlich
    Ophthalmology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  G.S. Regev, None; A. Harris, None; B. Siesky, None; A. Moss, None; L. Cantor, None; D. WuDunn, None; Y. Catoira-Boyle, None; J. Abrams, None; R. Ehrlich, None.
  • Footnotes
    Support  Pfizer and Research to Prevent Blindness (RPB)
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science April 2009, Vol.50, 2867. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      G. S. Regev, A. Harris, B. Siesky, A. Moss, L. Cantor, D. WuDunn, Y. Catoira-Boyle, J. Abrams, R. Ehrlich; Comparison of Goldmann Applanation Tonometry and Dynamic Contour Tonometry in Primary Open Angle Glaucoma. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2009;50(13):2867.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose: : To compare the measurements of intraocular pressure (IOP) as measured by Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT) and dynamic contour tonometry (DCT) and to assess their dependence on central corneal thickness (CCT) in primary open angle glaucoma (OAG).

Methods: : In a prospective observational study, GAT and DCT were used, in a randomized order, to measure the IOP of 186 eyes in 93 OAG patients (mean age 65.5 (10.5); 58% female) participating in the Indianapolis Glaucoma Progression Study (IGPS). Immediately afterwards, CCT was measured using ultrasonic corneal pachymetry. Bland-Altman plots were used to evaluate the agreement between tonometers, and limits of agreement were determined. Multivariate regression analysis was used to evaluate the influence of CCT on IOP measurements obtained with both tonometers.

Results: : IOP values obtained by DCT and GAT were strongly correlated in all eyes (r=0.92; P<0.001). DCT measurements (mean ± SD, 18.3 ± 4.7 mm Hg) were significantly (P<0.001) higher than GAT measurements (mean ± SD, 16.6 ± 4.1 mm Hg). Measurements with GAT and DCT measurements were not correlated with CCT (GAT: r = 0.1025, P = 0.16, DCT: r = 0.05, P = 0.46).

Conclusions: : In OAG patients, IOP measurements by DCT and GAT revealed a strong correlation. Intraocular pressure measured by GAT was consistently lower when compared with DCT. GAT and DCT were not correlated with central corneal thickness.

Keywords: intraocular pressure • cornea: clinical science • cornea: basic science 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×