April 2009
Volume 50, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   April 2009
The Veterans Affairs Low Vision Intervention Trial (LOVIT)Follow-Up: 12 Month Outcomes
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • J. Stelmack
    VA Affairs-Bldg 113, Hines VA Hospital, Hines, Illinois
  • X. Tang
    VA Affairs-Bldg 113, Hines VA Hospital, Hines, Illinois
  • R. W. Massof
    Johns Hopkins Wilmer Eye Institute, Baltimore, Maryland
  • LOVIT Study Group
    VA Affairs-Bldg 113, Hines VA Hospital, Hines, Illinois
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  J. Stelmack, None; X. Tang, None; R.W. Massof, None.
  • Footnotes
    Support  Department of Veterans Affairs Rehabilitation Research and Development Service #C3457
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science April 2009, Vol.50, 3206. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      J. Stelmack, X. Tang, R. W. Massof, LOVIT Study Group; The Veterans Affairs Low Vision Intervention Trial (LOVIT)Follow-Up: 12 Month Outcomes. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2009;50(13):3206.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose: : A RCT was conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of a low vision program for veterans with vision loss (VA ≤20/100 >20/500) from macular diseases. 126 patients from Chicago and Salisbury, NC VA facilities were randomized to low vision treatment or a waiting list control group. Usual low vision care was provided for the control group after 4 months.

Methods: : Exploratory analysis was conducted to compare mean changes in VA LV VFQ-48 scores within the treatment and control groups at three time points. Subjects included 44 treated patients (who didn’t receive additional low vision services after the 4-month follow-up) and 56 control patients who received low vision services after the 4-month follow-up. Rasch analysis was performed to estimate scores from the ratings on VA LV VFQ-48 items. Paired t-tests were used for pre and post changes.

Results: : Treatment group subjects showed significant improvement (P<.001) in visual reading ability (2.40 logits, SD 1) and overall visual ability (1.62 logits, SD .66) after low vision rehabilitation; effects decreased between 4 months and the 12 month follow-up in visual reading ability (-0.42 logits, SD 0.77) and overall visual ability (-0.26 SD .71). However, subjects were still statistically and clinically significantly better at their 1-year follow-up than before beginning treatment. Trends were noted for decreases in vitality and mental health scores on the SF-36 from baseline to one year. Control group subjects demonstrated a significant loss in visual reading ability (-0.41 logits, SD 0.51) and overall visual ability (-0.21 logits, SD 0.36) while waiting for services and a significant gain in visual reading ability (2.0 logits, SD 1.13) and visual ability (1.11 logits, SD 0.65) after low vision rehabilitation was provided.

Conclusions: : The loss of visual ability at 4 months in patients who were waiting for low vision services calls for early intervention. The magnitude of the cross-over effect in the control group after treatment confirms the treatment effect described for the RCT.

Clinical Trial: : www.clinicaltrials.gov NCT00223756

Keywords: clinical (human) or epidemiologic studies: outcomes/complications • low vision • reading 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×