April 2009
Volume 50, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   April 2009
Persistent Subretinal Electrical Stimulation Preserves Rod and Cone Function and Induces Prolonged Expression of Fgf2 in RCS Rats
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • V. T. Ciavatta
    Ophthalmology, US Dept of Veterans Affairs, Decatur, Georgia
  • M. K. Kim
    Ophthalmology, US Dept of Veterans Affairs, Decatur, Georgia
  • Y. Cao
    Ophthalmology, US Dept of Veterans Affairs, Decatur, Georgia
  • A. E. Faulkner
    Ophthalmology, US Dept of Veterans Affairs, Decatur, Georgia
  • M. T. Pardue
    Ophthalmology, US Dept of Veterans Affairs, Decatur, Georgia
    Ophthalmology, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  V.T. Ciavatta, None; M.K. Kim, None; Y. Cao, None; A.E. Faulkner, None; M.T. Pardue, None.
  • Footnotes
    Support  Rehab R&D Center, Department of Veteran Affairs
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science April 2009, Vol.50, 3228. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      V. T. Ciavatta, M. K. Kim, Y. Cao, A. E. Faulkner, M. T. Pardue; Persistent Subretinal Electrical Stimulation Preserves Rod and Cone Function and Induces Prolonged Expression of Fgf2 in RCS Rats. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2009;50(13):3228.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose: : Previous studies showed preservation of photoreceptors and dark-adapted ERG response after 4 and 6 weeks of electrical stimulation from a subretinally-implanted microphotodiode array (MPA) (Pardue et al., IOVS 2005). Selective induction of Fgf2 after 1 week of MPA subretinal electrical stimulation has also been observed (Ciavatta et al., 2007 E-ARVO abstract 663). The present study examined the effects of MPA subretinal electrical stimulation on neuroprotection and growth factor expression in RCS rats at 4 weeks post-implantation.

Methods: : At postnatal day 21 (P21), RCS rats were monocularly treated with a functional MPA (n=4), non-functional MPA (n=3), or no surgery (n=3). The functional MPA delivers ~500 µA/cm2 in response to the brightest ERG flash. ERGs, consisting of 10 dark-adapted steps (-3.4 to 2.1 log cd-s/m2) and 7 light-adapted steps (-0.82 to 1.88 log cd-s/m2), were recorded weekly for 4 weeks. Real-time RT-PCR was used to measure relative expression of Bdnf, Fgf2, Fgf1, Cntf, Gdnf, and Igf1 in retina samples collected 2 days after the final ERG.

Results: : Four weeks after surgery, the functional MPA treated eyes had 40% larger dark- and light-adapted ERG b-waves than the non-functional MPA treated eyes and the no surgery eyes (ANOVA, p < 0.01). Relative Fgf2 expression was greatest for the functional MPA implanted (3.28 +/-0.61) compared to the non-function (1.28 +/-0.32) and no surgery groups (1.05 +/-0.04) (ANOVA, p < 0.05, respectively). No significant expression changes were detected among the other growth factors.

Conclusions: : Preservation of dark- and light-adapted ERG b-wave amplitude 4 weeks after functional MPA implantation suggests that subretinal electrical stimulation preserves rod and cone function in the RCS rat. The selective induction of the gene for FGF2 after 4 weeks of treatment suggests this growth factor is an important part of the subretinal electrical stimulation neuroprotective mechanism.

Keywords: neuroprotection • retina • growth factors/growth factor receptors 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×