April 2009
Volume 50, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   April 2009
Effect of Transcorneal Electrical Stimulation on Rat Retinal Function After Bright Light Exposure
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • H. Zhang
    Centre for Ophthalmology, University-Eye-Hospital, Tuebingen, Germany
  • A. Messias
    Centre for Ophthalmology, University-Eye-Hospital, Tuebingen, Germany
  • A. Schatz
    Centre for Ophthalmology, University-Eye-Hospital, Tuebingen, Germany
  • E. Zrenner
    Centre for Ophthalmology, University-Eye-Hospital, Tuebingen, Germany
  • K. Bartz-Schmidt
    Centre for Ophthalmology, University-Eye-Hospital, Tuebingen, Germany
  • F. Gekeler
    Centre for Ophthalmology, University-Eye-Hospital, Tuebingen, Germany
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  H. Zhang, Okuvision GmbH, F; A. Messias, Okuvision GmbH, F; A. Schatz, Okuvision GmbH, F; E. Zrenner, Okuvision GmbH, F; K. Bartz-Schmidt, Okuvision GmbH, F; F. Gekeler, Okuvision GmbH, F.
  • Footnotes
    Support  None.
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science April 2009, Vol.50, 3615. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      H. Zhang, A. Messias, A. Schatz, E. Zrenner, K. Bartz-Schmidt, F. Gekeler; Effect of Transcorneal Electrical Stimulation on Rat Retinal Function After Bright Light Exposure. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2009;50(13):3615.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose: : To investigate whether transcorneal electrical stimulation (TES) using a gold-ring contact lens electrode has effects on retinal function recovery in rats after strong light exposure.

Methods: : Eight Sprague-Dawley rats (age 4 weeks, weight 80-100g) were dark adapted for >12 hrs before 6 hours intense light exposure (20000 lux). Extended ISCEV protocol electroretinograms (ERGs) were recorded one and two weeks after light exposure. Animals were assigned into two groups: control (n=5) and TES (n=3). TES was applied once via a custom made contact lens electrode with a gold ring on the right eye, immediately before 6 hours light exposure. A neuro-stimulator (TWISTER) was used with the following settings: 1 ms-biphasic current pulses; 30 min duration; frequency 20 Hz; current 0.1 mA.

Results: : After two weeks dark adapted ERG values of a saturating rod flash (3 cd*s/m²) differed significantly in the right eyes of the two groups (control vs. TES; mean±SEM): a-wave amplitude (µV): 77.02±24.64 vs. 149.66±17.00; a-wave implicit time (ms): 12.00±3.05 vs. 16.33±0.33; b-wave amplitude (µV): 273.90±75.47 vs. 598.59±75.29; b-wave implicit time (ms): 50.00±8.07 vs. 73.00±1.53; oscillatory potentials (µV x ms): 575.88±156.67 vs. 1184.99±154.80. Values of a Naka-Rushton fit also differed significantly: Vmax (µV): 327.11±28.33 vs. 565.86±65.31; k (log cd*s/m²): -2.86±0.09 vs. -2.57±0.00. There was no statistically significant difference in a-wave, b-wave or OP in the left eyes of the two groups after scotopic and photopic ERG measurement.

Conclusions: : Our data show that transcorneal electrical stimulation improves retinal recovery after strong light exposure, which indicates a potential neuroprotective effect, improving the tolerance of retinal function to light damage.

Keywords: retina • neuroprotection • electrophysiology: non-clinical 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×