April 2009
Volume 50, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   April 2009
Intravitreal Bevacizumab for Macular Edema Secondary to Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • E. Sato
    Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Chiba University Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba, Japan
  • R. Kimoto
    Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Chiba University Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba, Japan
  • E. Arai
    Matsudo City Hospital, Department of Ophthalmology, Matsudo, Japan
  • Y. Mitamura
    Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Chiba University Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba, Japan
  • S. Yamamoto
    Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Chiba University Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba, Japan
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  E. Sato, None; R. Kimoto, None; E. Arai, None; Y. Mitamura, None; S. Yamamoto, None.
  • Footnotes
    Support  None.
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science April 2009, Vol.50, 3719. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      E. Sato, R. Kimoto, E. Arai, Y. Mitamura, S. Yamamoto; Intravitreal Bevacizumab for Macular Edema Secondary to Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2009;50(13):3719.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose: : To report the one-year results of intravitreal injections of bevacizumab (IVB) for the treatment of macular edema secondary to branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO).

Methods: : Forty-seven eyes of 47 consecutive patients (mean age 68.6 years; 20 men and 27 women) treated with IVB (1.25 mg/0.05 ml) for macular edema due to a BRVO were reviewed. All patients completed at least 12 months of follow-up. Patients had a complete ophthalmic evaluation including Snellen visual acuity (VA), optical coherence tomography (OCT), and/or angiographic testing at baseline and at follow-up visits. IVB was given as needed based on the presence of macular edema on OCT.

Results: : The time between the onset of symptoms and the first injection averaged 5.6 months (range, 1 to 13.3). Patients received an average of 1.7 injections (range, one to four). The mean VA improved significantly from 0.68 logMAR units at baseline to 0.42 logMAR units at 12 months (P<0.01). The mean central retinal thickness (CRT) was 525 micron at baseline and decreased to 271 at 12 months (P <0.01). An improvement of the BCVA by at least 0.2 logMAR units was seen in 29 (61.7%) of the 47 eyes, and 49% had a final VA of 20/40 or better. The degree of angiographically-documented macular ischemia was significantly higher, and the duration of disease was longer in eyes with final BCVA less than 20/40.

Conclusions: : Intravitreal injections of bevacizumab are effective in treating macular edema due to BRVO. No ocular toxicity or adverse effects were observed.

Keywords: retina • clinical (human) or epidemiologic studies: outcomes/complications 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×