April 2009
Volume 50, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   April 2009
Is Adaptation to Vision Loss an Independent Predictor of Vision-Specific Quality of Life in Older Australian Adults?
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • J. Xie
    Department of Ophthalmology, Centre for Eye Research Australia, East Melbourne, Australia
  • E. L. Lamoureux
    Department of Ophthalmology, Centre for Eye Research Australia, East Melbourne, Australia
  • G. Rees
    Department of Ophthalmology, Centre for Eye Research Australia, East Melbourne, Australia
  • J. E. Keeffe
    Department of Ophthalmology, Centre for Eye Research Australia, East Melbourne, Australia
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  J. Xie, None; E.L. Lamoureux, None; G. Rees, None; J.E. Keeffe, None.
  • Footnotes
    Support  Australian Research Council Linkage grant
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science April 2009, Vol.50, 3763. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      J. Xie, E. L. Lamoureux, G. Rees, J. E. Keeffe; Is Adaptation to Vision Loss an Independent Predictor of Vision-Specific Quality of Life in Older Australian Adults?. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2009;50(13):3763.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose: : To investigate if adaptation to vision loss (AVL) was independently associated with overall and specific aspects of vision-related quality of life (QoL) in older Australian adults with low vision.

Methods: : Participants were aged 58 and over, had presenting visual acuity (VA) 1.0 LogMAR), and 58.7% female) participated in the study. In multivariable linear regression models, AVL score was independently associated with the total IVI score (coefficients [β]=1.60, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.02, 2.18, p<0.001), and three IVI subscales (reading and accessing information, mobility and independence, and emotional well-being) (β [95% CI]:1.67 [0.73, 2.63]; 2.69 [1.69, 3.70] and 2.25 [1.26, 3.24], respectively, all p<0.001) after adjustment for age, gender, marital status, educational level, living arrangement, VA, duration of low vision, and comorbidity. The AVL explained 32%, 19%, 29%, and 25% of the variance in total IVI and three subscales, respectively. After adjustment for similar covariates, AVL score was not associated with duration of low vision (β [95% CI]:0.07 [-0.09, 0.22].

Conclusions: : Better adaptation to vision loss was significantly associated with better QoL. These findings suggest that improve intervention to adaptation to vision loss can help to promote a better QoL in older people with low vision.

Keywords: quality of life • low vision • clinical (human) or epidemiologic studies: outcomes/complications 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×