April 2009
Volume 50, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   April 2009
Self Reported Visual Functioning and Quality of Life in the Subfoveal Radiotherapy Study (SFRADS)
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • F. Denny
    Centre for Statistical Science and Operational Research,
    Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, United Kingdom
  • A. H. Marshall
    Centre for Statistical Science and Operational Research,
    Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, United Kingdom
  • M. R. Stevenson
    Centre for Clinical and Population Sciences,
    Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, United Kingdom
  • U. Chakravarthy
    Centre for Vision Science,
    Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, United Kingdom
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  F. Denny, None; A.H. Marshall, None; M.R. Stevenson, None; U. Chakravarthy, None.
  • Footnotes
    Support  Department of Employment and Learning (DEL), Northern Ireland Postgraduate Studentship
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science April 2009, Vol.50, 3764. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      F. Denny, A. H. Marshall, M. R. Stevenson, U. Chakravarthy; Self Reported Visual Functioning and Quality of Life in the Subfoveal Radiotherapy Study (SFRADS). Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2009;50(13):3764.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose: : To evaluate the longitudinal relationships between change in best corrected distance visual acuity (BC DVA) and change in self reported visual functioning and quality of life in a dataset obtained as part of a controlled clinical trial.

Methods: : BCVA was available in the subfoveal radiotherapy study at baseline, 6, 12 and 24 months along with data from two quality of life (QoL) instruments, the daily living tasks dependent on vision (DLTV) and the SF-36. To test the relationship between BC DVA and QoL longitudinally, an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) was performed with QoL domain scores as the outcome variable and BC DVA in better and worse eye as covariates without reference to treatment assignment. Linear regression was performed to examine cross-sectional relationships between BC DVA and domains from the two instruments.

Results: : Domains 1 and 2 of the DLTV exhibited the strongest relationships with BC DVA with one line of acuity loss in the better eye equating to a drop in domain scores of 2.8 and 2.6 respectively. In the SF-36 the GHP and PF domain scores dropped by 1.1 and 1.3 respectively per line of acuity loss. Effect estimates using a cross-sectional approach were twice as large as those in the longitudinal analysis with the greatest impact seen at baseline.

Conclusions: : The results of this study indicate that adaptation may be a contributing factor to patient based responses.

Keywords: quality of life • clinical (human) or epidemiologic studies: biostatistics/epidemiology methodology • age-related macular degeneration 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×