April 2009
Volume 50, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   April 2009
Evaluation of the Effect of Visual Impairment on Quality of Life of Children Aged 3-16
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • R. K. Chadha
    Optometry Department, Oxford Radcliffe Hospitals NHS Trust, Oxford, United Kingdom
  • J. Steen
    Optometry Department, Oxford Radcliffe Hospitals NHS Trust, Oxford, United Kingdom
  • A. Subramanian
    Department of Optometry and Vision Science, City University, London, United Kingdom
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  R.K. Chadha, None; J. Steen, None; A. Subramanian, None.
  • Footnotes
    Support  None.
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science April 2009, Vol.50, 3766. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      R. K. Chadha, J. Steen, A. Subramanian; Evaluation of the Effect of Visual Impairment on Quality of Life of Children Aged 3-16. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2009;50(13):3766.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose: : The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of visual impairment (VI) on Quality of Life (QOL) of children aged 3-16 using the Low Vision Quality of Life Questionnaire, (LVQOL) (maximum score = 125).This is the first study, to the authors’ knowledge, that contains a control arm for children with visual impairment.

Methods: : The study was divided into 2 arms; arm 1 compared QOL in children (n = 7, mean age 6.50 ± 4.41 years) pre and then post low vision aid assessment. Arm 2 compared QOL in children deemed to be visually rehabilitated (n = 24, mean age 10.13 ± 2.89 years) to that of age matched controls (n = 24, mean age 9.83 ± 2.81 years). In addition, data from the visually rehabilitated group was used to look for any demographic or visual factors that could be used as correlates or predictors of QOL.

Results: : Total QOL scores pre and post low vision aid assessment were not statistically different (88.09 ± 18.25 vs. 85.25 ± 14.77 P = 0.520). Children deemed to be visually rehabilitated had statistically lower total QOL scores than age matched controls (80.50 ± 25.21 vs. 116.00 ± 12.68 P < 0.001). Total QOL scores in children with VI were correlated with distance visual acuity (P = 0.014) and near visual acuity (P = 0.018). 20% of the variance in QOL could be predicted by these variables.

Conclusions: : With the drive towards inclusive education for all children in the UK, where children with VI are assessed alongside normally sighted peers, consideration of the effects of this reduced QOL must be made.There is a need for further research to establish the causes for the reduced QOL in visually rehabilitated children such that future services and care packages can be tailored to meet individual needs and requirements and therefore reduce the disparity in theoutcomes of rehabilitation programmes.

Keywords: quality of life • low vision 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×