April 2009
Volume 50, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   April 2009
Evaluation of Visual Performance After PRP in Patients With Bilateral PDR With the Use of the National Eye Institute 25-item Visual Function Questionnaire
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • M. K. Tsilimbaris
    Medical School, University of Crete, Heraklion, Greece
  • C. Tsika
    Medical School, University of Crete, Heraklion, Greece
  • D. Papageorgiou
    Medical School, University of Crete, Heraklion, Greece
  • M. Charoniti
    Medical School, University of Crete, Heraklion, Greece
  • J. Moschandrea
    Medical School, University of Crete, Heraklion, Greece
  • I. Pallikaris
    Medical School, University of Crete, Heraklion, Greece
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  M.K. Tsilimbaris, None; C. Tsika, None; D. Papageorgiou, None; M. Charoniti, None; J. Moschandrea, None; I. Pallikaris, None.
  • Footnotes
    Support  None.
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science April 2009, Vol.50, 3770. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      M. K. Tsilimbaris, C. Tsika, D. Papageorgiou, M. Charoniti, J. Moschandrea, I. Pallikaris; Evaluation of Visual Performance After PRP in Patients With Bilateral PDR With the Use of the National Eye Institute 25-item Visual Function Questionnaire. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2009;50(13):3770.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose: : To evaluate the effect on visual functions of laser panretinal photocoagulation (PRP) as a treatment for bilateral Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy

Methods: : In this study, the longer version of the National Eye Institute 25-Item Visual Function Questionnaire (VFQ-25+Optional Items) was used to evaluate the qualitative changes in patients’ vision. 20 patients (12 males and 8 females) with bilateral Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy (or unilateral if monocularly deprived) treated with PRP were included (median of age: 62.5 , range: 27-80). Patients received 4,123 laser spots (200 um) per eye in average, in consecutive sessions. The VFQ-25 was filled in by interview twice, at the beginning and at least one month after the completion of the PRP. The score for each question was noted at a scale of 100 and all the questions were classified in 12 categories, equally counted among at the final score. According to our sample, after appropriate power calculation, a difference of 20 points was accepted as statistically significant difference between the 2 sessions.

Results: : 60% (12 out of 20) of the patients didn’t report significant changes at the quality of their vision after the treatment with PRP, whereas a 25% (5 out of 20) stated significant amelioration and another 15% (3 out of 20) significant deterioration of their vision. Additionally, there was no significant difference in any of the questionnaire subscales.

Conclusions: : Panretinal photocoagulation as applied in our study, although destructive in nature, is well tolerated by the patients, without interfering significantly with their quality of life.

Keywords: diabetic retinopathy • quality of life • laser 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×