April 2009
Volume 50, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   April 2009
Repeatability of Spectral Domain and Time Domain OCT Retinal Thickness Measurements
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • S. Gangaputra
    UW-Ophthalmology & Visual Sciences, Fundus Photograph Reading Center, Madison, Wisconsin
  • A. Domalpally
    UW-Ophthalmology & Visual Sciences, Fundus Photograph Reading Center, Madison, Wisconsin
  • Q. Peng
    UW-Ophthalmology & Visual Sciences, Fundus Photograph Reading Center, Madison, Wisconsin
  • R. P. Danis, Jr.
    UW-Ophthalmology & Visual Sciences, Fundus Photograph Reading Center, Madison, Wisconsin
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  S. Gangaputra, None; A. Domalpally, None; Q. Peng, None; R.P. Danis, Jr., Topcon Medical Systems, F.
  • Footnotes
    Support  Topcon Medical Systems
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science April 2009, Vol.50, 3790. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      S. Gangaputra, A. Domalpally, Q. Peng, R. P. Danis, Jr.; Repeatability of Spectral Domain and Time Domain OCT Retinal Thickness Measurements. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2009;50(13):3790.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose: : To evaluate the relative reproducibility of retinal thickness measurements from spectral domain (SD-OCT; Topcon: 3D-OCT1000) and time domain (TD-OCT; Carl Zeiss Meditec: Stratus) optical coherence tomography (OCT).Methodology: Replicate measurements on each eye with each OCT instrument was performed on 138 eyes of 73 subjects in a University Retina Clinic. Subjects had a spectrum of diagnoses (Age related macular degeneration =30, Diabetic macular edema=16, Retinal vein occlusions =5, no acute disease (normal fellow eyes) =10, other =12). Macular thickness measurements of the 9 standard subfields were obtained and compared.

Results: : The coefficient of repeatability (23 vs. 25) and the coefficient of variation (3% vs. 4%) of retinal thickness measurements in the central subfield were lower by SD-OCT as compared to TDOCT. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) for central subfield measurements was 0.99 by both instruments, demonstrating high intrasession repeatability. The absolute difference between SD-OCT and TD-OCT for central subfield thickness (mean ±SD) was 22.1µ ± 26.5µ, mean inner subfield was 15.1µ ± 12.7µ and mean outer subfield was 11.9µ ± 7.4µ.

Keywords: clinical (human) or epidemiologic studies: systems/equipment/techniques • imaging methods (CT, FA, ICG, MRI, OCT, RTA, SLO, ultrasound) • retina 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×