April 2009
Volume 50, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   April 2009
The Implicit Surface in the Fellow Eyes of Amblyopes
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • S. Kelly
    Basic Science, Illinois College of Optometry, Chicago, Illinois
  • D. Baker
    Basic Science, Illinois College of Optometry, Chicago, Illinois
  • M. Henrickson
    Basic Science, Illinois College of Optometry, Chicago, Illinois
  • E. Ittner
    Basic Science, Illinois College of Optometry, Chicago, Illinois
  • M. Saeed
    Basic Science, Illinois College of Optometry, Chicago, Illinois
  • Y. Pang
    Basic Science, Illinois College of Optometry, Chicago, Illinois
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  S. Kelly, None; D. Baker, None; M. Henrickson, None; E. Ittner, None; M. Saeed, None; Y. Pang, None.
  • Footnotes
    Support  Grant from the Faculty Research Fund; Illinois College of Optometry
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science April 2009, Vol.50, 3821. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      S. Kelly, D. Baker, M. Henrickson, E. Ittner, M. Saeed, Y. Pang; The Implicit Surface in the Fellow Eyes of Amblyopes. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2009;50(13):3821.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose: : In full cue conditions, humans can veridically locate a target at intermediate and far distances if they can accurately perceive the target’s angular declination and the slant of the near ground surface. However, in the dark, observers usually underestimate the distance of self-illuminated targets and overestimate the height. Since subjects can correctly perceive angular declination in the dark, these perceptual errors arise from the subject’s forced dependence on an internal reference plane, or implicit surface, as the ground surface is not visible. The intersection of the target’s angle of declination with this implicit surface is used to determine the target’s perceived location in darkness. The presence of an amblyogenic factor during development may adversely affect the formation of the implicit surface; specifically its slant. We compared distance and height perception, angle of declination and implicit surface slant obtained from visual normals to those obtained from the fellow eyes of amblyopic observers.

Methods: : The perceived distance of a self-illuminated target was measured at 6 distances ranging from 4m-7.5m using the blind-walking paradigm. Hand gestures were used to indicate perceived height. All subjects were given practice trials prior to testing. Twenty visually normal observers served as controls. Distance and height perception were measured in the fellow eyes of four strabismic amblyopes, three anisometropic amblyopes and one deprivation-induced amblyope.

Results: : Our experiments revealed that: 1) like visual normals, the amblyopes underestimate target distance and overestimate height; 2) visual normals, anisometropic and strabismic amblyopes correctly perceive the angular declination of the self-illuminated targets; 3) the slant of the intrinsic surface for the visually normal observers is 16.9 deg; for anisometropic amblyopes it is 10.33 deg; and for the strabismic amblyopes it is 7.98 deg.

Conclusions: : Like visual normals the amblyopes misjudge the egocentric height and distance of targets in the dark. However their perceptual errors are not the same. The source of errors for all groups appears to reside, at least in part, in the slant of the implicit surface.

Keywords: amblyopia • strabismus • shape, form, contour, object perception 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×