April 2009
Volume 50, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   April 2009
Comparison of the Effects of Different Diuretics on Defocus-Induced Refractive Compensation
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • D. P. Crewther
    Brain Sciences Institute, Swinburne Univ of Technology, Hawthorn, Australia
  • M. Murphy
    Psychological Science, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia
  • S. G. Crewther
    Psychological Science, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  D.P. Crewther, None; M. Murphy, None; S.G. Crewther, None.
  • Footnotes
    Support  NHMRC
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science April 2009, Vol.50, 3836. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      D. P. Crewther, M. Murphy, S. G. Crewther; Comparison of the Effects of Different Diuretics on Defocus-Induced Refractive Compensation. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2009;50(13):3836.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose: : The study compared the effects of diuretic substances that inhibit retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) cotransport systems on defocus induced refractive error induction in chicks.

Methods: : 57 chicks were fitted with +10D, -10D lenses or wore no lens on the right eye, from day 5 to day 9 after hatching. The right eye was injected with 5µl of 1 mM amiloride, 1 mM bumetanide, or 1 mM furosemide dissolved in DMSO, or DMSO alone. Fellow eyes received the same volume of DMSO. Chicks were reared on a 12 hr light 12 hr dark cycle and had unlimited food and water and were maintained at 31°C. Biometry including retinoscopy and A-scan ultrasonography, which were performed on day 9. Electroretinography was performed on subgroups of chicks (generally n=3).

Results: : All three diuretics showed an ability to prevent the full compensation to -10D lenses, however the responses to +ve lenses was more varied. Rather than the diuretic forcing an overall reduction of fluid in the eye, such changes were only observed in combination with negative defocus a condition normally associated with retention of water in the eye.

Conclusions: : All three diuretics showed an ability to prevent the full compensation to -10D lenses, however the responses to +ve lenses was more varied. Rather than the diuretic forcing an overall reduction of fluid in the eye, such changes were only observed in combination with negative defocus a condition normally associated with retention of water in the eye. The results are discussed with respect to the electrophysiological effects of these diuretics on retinal function.

Keywords: myopia • drug toxicity/drug effects 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×