April 2009
Volume 50, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   April 2009
The Effectiveness of Glaucoma Screening
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • A. J. Almashhari
    Ophthal/Edward S Harkness Eye Inst, Columbia Univ Medical Center, New York, New York
  • L. Alaswad
    Ophthal/Edward S Harkness Eye Inst, Columbia Univ Medical Center, New York, New York
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  A.J. Almashhari, None; L. Alaswad, None.
  • Footnotes
    Support  Congressional Glaucoma Caucus
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science April 2009, Vol.50, 4084. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      A. J. Almashhari, L. Alaswad; The Effectiveness of Glaucoma Screening. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2009;50(13):4084.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Methods: : Tonometry, screening FDT, fundus examination, and a detailed medical and ophthalmic history were used to screen 2403 individuals for glaucoma in a population based study. Individuals of different ethnicities in the New York area 2006 to 2008. Main outcome measured: high IOP, visual filed defect and optic nerve change characteristic for glaucoma.

Results: : From the 2403 individuals screened for glaucoma, 400(16.64%) individuals were identified as possible glaucoma or glaucoma suspect. After multiple phone calls 80(20%) managed to followed up in different offices and 320 (80%) were lost to follow up. 42(10.5%) individuals were confirmed as glaucoma, 6(1.5%) were diagnosed as glaucoma suspect, 1(0.25%) was diagnosed as ocular hypertension and 28(7%) did not have glaucoma. 3(0.75%) individuals were diagnosed with other ophthalmic disease.

Clinical Trial: : irb

Keywords: clinical (human) or epidemiologic studies: prevalence/incidence • clinical (human) or epidemiologic studies: prevalence/incidence • clinical (human) or epidemiologic studies: prevalence/incidence 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×