April 2009
Volume 50, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   April 2009
Pupillary Light Reflex in Blind Retinitis Pigmentosa Patients: Investigation Before and After Implantation of a Subretinal Visual Prosthesis
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • A. Bruckmann
    Centre for Ophthalmology, University Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany
  • T. Peters
    Centre for Ophthalmology, University Tuebingen, Steinbeis Transfer Center, Germany
  • J. Miltenberger
    Centre for Ophthalmology, University Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany
  • H. Luedtke
    Datinf GmbH, Tuebingen, Germany
  • H. Wilhelm
    Centre for Ophthalmology, University Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany
  • B. Wilhelm
    Centre for Ophthalmology, University Tuebingen, Steinbeis Transfer Center, Germany
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  A. Bruckmann, None; T. Peters, Retina Implant AG, C; J. Miltenberger, None; H. Luedtke, None; H. Wilhelm, None; B. Wilhelm, Retina Implant AG, C.
  • Footnotes
    Support  Retina Implant AG, Reutlingen, Germany; BMBF01KP0401 of the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science April 2009, Vol.50, 4584. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      A. Bruckmann, T. Peters, J. Miltenberger, H. Luedtke, H. Wilhelm, B. Wilhelm; Pupillary Light Reflex in Blind Retinitis Pigmentosa Patients: Investigation Before and After Implantation of a Subretinal Visual Prosthesis. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2009;50(13):4584.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose: : Blindness in degenerative retinal diseases like retinitis pigmentosa (RP) is associated with a lack of common stimulus-response characteristics of the pupillary light reflex (PLR) or an absent light reaction. Novel knowledge about the role of melanopsin ganglion cells in the pupillary light reflex regulation puts this association into question.This matter was investigated systematically with pupillography in blind RP patients during study recruitment for the first clinical pilot trial with a Subretinal Active Multiphotodiode Array (MPDA).

Methods: : Ten patients suffering from RP with no reproducible light perception were tested during screening, eight of them were included in the RIM trial, seven patients were implanted with the MPDA. Stimulus intensities of 0.36, 4.0, 36.3 lx corneal illumination were applied with an automated infrared video pupillograph (CIP; AMTech, Germany) in darkness. Each examination was performed twice (functional placebo-control with power supply once switched off).Mean of latency and amplitude of the PLR averaged from four complete and reliable pupillograms entered the analysis.

Results: : Baseline examination (n=10): no light reflex elicitible for 0.36 lx (lowest stimulus intensity); for 4.0 lx constriction amplitude was 0.13 +/- 0.28 and for 36.3 lx amplitude was 0.47 +/- 0.4 mm. In contradiction to usual physiological findings the visual threshold was inconsistently above the pupillomotor threshold. Pupils sometimes reacted to unseen stimuli. Stimulation of the MPDA was able to elicit pupillary light reflexes.

Conclusions: : PLR and its usual dose-response relationship are preserved in blind RP patients to a larger extend than expected. Investigations in blind RP patients may help to better understand the role of melanopsin ganglion cells in man.

Clinical Trial: : www.clinicaltrials.gov NCT00515814

Keywords: pupillary reflex • retinal degenerations: hereditary • retina 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×